2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the physical differences between tensile testing of type 304 and 316 austenitic stainless steels with internal hydrogen and in external hydrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crack growth is only calculated by equation (4) as no crack growth along a grain boundary is modelled. The irreversibility constant C CTSD is determined with 0.2 µm/cycle by comparing the calculated with the experimentally observed crack growth in Figure 9 c).…”
Section: Simulation Results Of Uncharged Specimens In X2-12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The crack growth is only calculated by equation (4) as no crack growth along a grain boundary is modelled. The irreversibility constant C CTSD is determined with 0.2 µm/cycle by comparing the calculated with the experimentally observed crack growth in Figure 9 c).…”
Section: Simulation Results Of Uncharged Specimens In X2-12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can occur separately or in combination, so that different mechanisms can take the dominant role during crack initiation and crack growth. Most of the research on hydrogen embrittlement of stainless steels deals with the characterization of long fatigue crack growth behaviour [2,3] or the effect of hydrogen on monotonic properties obtained in tensile tests [4,5]. There is only little information available about the mechanisms of crack initiation and early crack growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An external hydrogen source promotes crack initiation and propagation at the surface. Similar to surface cracks, the propagation of internal cracks is accelerated by the presence of internal hydrogen in the 304 and 316 SSs [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that the HE susceptibility of the austenitic SSs is affected by the compositions [35,36] and prestrained level of the SS [37,38]. Dynamic interactions between hydrogen and the induced martensite play important roles in the HE of the hydrogen-charged 304 SS [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that external hydrogen is more harmful than internal (precharged) hydrogen [21] in austenitic stainless steel. In this study, the specimens were not the same as those used in the previous study, but the lower crosshead speed probably provided time for the increment in hydrogen concentration at the fracture process zone due to external hydrogen absorption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%