2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the permanent hip-stabilizing effect of atmospheric pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism seems to be one of the main factors, maybe even the leading factor, in the avoidance of THA dislocation [13, 35, 3739]. This phenomenon has been described in detail by Prietzel et al [35, 38]. A shorter postoperative hospitalization period demonstrates that the application of the modified, less-invasive, capsule preserving R-THA technique is accompanied by further medical and economic benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This mechanism seems to be one of the main factors, maybe even the leading factor, in the avoidance of THA dislocation [13, 35, 3739]. This phenomenon has been described in detail by Prietzel et al [35, 38]. A shorter postoperative hospitalization period demonstrates that the application of the modified, less-invasive, capsule preserving R-THA technique is accompanied by further medical and economic benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some authors supported this theory by pointing out that the highest risk for dislocation occurs immediately after surgery before any pseudo-capsule has reformed in patients with previous capsular resection [38]. Beyond that, another study demonstrated that a repaired posterior capsule remained intact in 90% of patients at 3-months follow-up [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gegen die ROM als Hauptursache der geringeren Luxationsneigung spricht deren asymptotische Zunahme mit dem Kopfdurchmesser, die einen erheblichen Zuwachs im Bereich geringer Kopfdurchmesser zeigt, während die ROM-Zunahme bei größer werdenden Köpfen gegen null geht [46]. Dieses Verhalten steht im Widerspruch zur geringen Abnahme der Luxationsrate von 32mm-Köpfen im Vergleich zu 28-mm-Köpfen [13] und zur massiven Abnahme bei Einsatz von 36-mm-Köpfen in Relation zu 28mm-Köpfen [6,7].…”
Section: Argumente Gegen Die Rom-theorieunclassified
“…Emerging research investigates the biomechanical role and properties of the capsule [19][20][21][22][23]. This indicates that the contribution of the capsule to the mechanics of the joint may be more extensive than passive stabilization alone, particularly as no significant difference has been noted between the biomechanical properties of the capsular ligaments [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%