2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the performance of social network and likelihood-based expert weighting schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the weights may be taken as equal, perhaps on some Laplacian Principle of Indifference, or of equity, or, even, on the basis that all the experts are paid the same fee. 3 Recently, it has been suggested that the weights might be defined from the social network which surrounds the experts, one operationalisation being the relative frequency with which their work is cited in the literature [37], though I do not find this persuasive since it may be biased, e.g., by length of career, towards academics who tend to publish more than professionals and consultants, and towards those who write their papers in English.…”
Section: The Expert Problem: a Brief Survey Of Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatively, the weights may be taken as equal, perhaps on some Laplacian Principle of Indifference, or of equity, or, even, on the basis that all the experts are paid the same fee. 3 Recently, it has been suggested that the weights might be defined from the social network which surrounds the experts, one operationalisation being the relative frequency with which their work is cited in the literature [37], though I do not find this persuasive since it may be biased, e.g., by length of career, towards academics who tend to publish more than professionals and consultants, and towards those who write their papers in English.…”
Section: The Expert Problem: a Brief Survey Of Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Bayesian would surely believe this. Moreover, any use of social networking to define weights implicitly acknowledges unequal expertise [37]. Neutrality is persuasive, and Cooke uses it to justify his classical weighting scheme on the basis of scoring rules [32].…”
Section: The Textbook Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To perform the FTA based on expert judgments, a group of experts based on Cooke et al (2008) indicators need to be assembled and selected (10). In some cases, the credibility of experts based on various criteria, such as title (professional position), age, experience level, and educational qualification, is widely different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum-product method could be used to aggregate different fuzzy failure possibilities of a BE and it is expressed by the following Equation (5): (5): (10) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%