2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the particle sizing of torrefied biomass for co-firing with pulverized coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Saastamoinen et al [6] compared the single particle burning of pulverized wood to that for coal in the reaction condition of a large utility boiler, and concluded that a 500 µm wood particle has the same burnout time as that of a 200 µm Polish coal particle. Panahi et al [7] showed that torrefied biomass of 212-300 µm has a burnout time similar to that of 75-90 µm coal particles measured in a drop tube furnace at 1350 K. Magalhães et al [8] reported that the burnout time of agricultural residue sieved to 212-300 µm was comparable to two lignite coals of 106-125 µm. The burnout time of the biomass particles was influenced to a greater extent by the char conversion than the devolatilization, especially in the case of large particles [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For example, Saastamoinen et al [6] compared the single particle burning of pulverized wood to that for coal in the reaction condition of a large utility boiler, and concluded that a 500 µm wood particle has the same burnout time as that of a 200 µm Polish coal particle. Panahi et al [7] showed that torrefied biomass of 212-300 µm has a burnout time similar to that of 75-90 µm coal particles measured in a drop tube furnace at 1350 K. Magalhães et al [8] reported that the burnout time of agricultural residue sieved to 212-300 µm was comparable to two lignite coals of 106-125 µm. The burnout time of the biomass particles was influenced to a greater extent by the char conversion than the devolatilization, especially in the case of large particles [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A pulverizing mill (Raymond mill) was used here to pulverize the Australian coal. Then, the coal particles were sieved and selected to ensure a suitable size of 75 µm (200 mesh), based on the industry standard [33]. Finally, the pulverized fuels were introduced into the combustion chamber by primary air/RFG and combusted with secondary air (or a mixture of O 2 and RFG).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon reaching the final temperature, each sample was treated at constant conditions for 30 min. All torrefied biomass fuels were air-dried, chopped in a household blender, and size classified by sieving to obtain size cuts of (212-300 µm) based on the findings of previous study in this laboratory [23,24]. In a different study [25], it was observed that the torrefaction process reduced the particle aspect ratios and enhanced the uniformity of particle sizes.…”
Section: Preparation Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuel particles were introduced through a hole on the top of the injector, by placing a small number of particles at the tip of a beveled needle syringe, introducing the needle into the injector hole and giving it a gentle tap until single particles were seen burning in the furnace. Pyrometric observations of those particles were conducted from the top of the furnace injector, details of the pyrometer optics, electronics, calibration, and performance were given in [23,[27][28][29]]. An Edgertronic Self-Contained Digital High-Speed Broadband video camera was used, at speeds of 2000 frames per second.…”
Section: 2experimental Apparatus and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%