2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-59440-2.00003-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Orthogonality of Orbitals in Subsystem Kohn–Sham Density Functional Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, however, embedding schemes based on optimized effective potential [47][48][49], projection operators [45,[50][51][52][53], and fitted functionals [54,55], are paving the way for the correct description of covalent bonds (high density overlap) by FDE.…”
Section: Subsystem Dft and Td-dftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, embedding schemes based on optimized effective potential [47][48][49], projection operators [45,[50][51][52][53], and fitted functionals [54,55], are paving the way for the correct description of covalent bonds (high density overlap) by FDE.…”
Section: Subsystem Dft and Td-dftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ref. 21 and 22, Hoffmann and co-workers argue that SDFT and FDE can only be exact if the additional condition that the…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the analysis in ref. 21 and 22, we proceed by creating an explicitly orthonormalized combined set of subsystem orbitals for subsystems A and B, {f orth…”
Section: Ks-like Orbitals Of Subsystem a And B Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This non-additive kinetic energy may be approximated, 27,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] numerically calculated, 27,38,62 or eliminated all together through subsystem orbital orthogonalization. [63][64][65][66][67][68][69] The use of subsystem orbital orthogonalization methods for exact DFT embedding was studied by the Manby and Miller groups through the use of a constant shift µ-projection operator. 40,41,[70][71][72] This µ-projection operator demonstrated impressive results and in a later paper, Kallay and co-workers suggested 73 the use of the Huzinaga 74-76 level-shift projection operator as an alternative to the µ-projection operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%