2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the origins of enigmatic stellar populations in Local Group galactic nuclei

Abstract: We consider the origins of enigmatic stellar populations in four Local Group galactic nuclei, specifically the Milky Way, M31, M32 and M33. These are centrally concentrated blue stars, found in three out of the four nuclear star clusters (NSCs) considered here. Their origins are unknown, but could include blue straggler (BS) stars, extended horizontal branch stars and young recently formed stars. Here, we calculate order-of-magnitude estimates for various collision rates, as a function of the host NSC environm… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we note that some of the neutron stars delivered by the GCs may mass-segregate to some extent and also be successfully exchanged in few-body interactions in binaries that later could lead to the formation of MSPs, which could enhance our predicted rate (Leigh et al 2016). This would give a maximum contribution roughly comparable to the in situ formation scenario, which can account only for ∼ 1/4 of the excess (Eckner et al 2018), being the mass in GCs of the order of the mass of the nuclear star cluster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Finally, we note that some of the neutron stars delivered by the GCs may mass-segregate to some extent and also be successfully exchanged in few-body interactions in binaries that later could lead to the formation of MSPs, which could enhance our predicted rate (Leigh et al 2016). This would give a maximum contribution roughly comparable to the in situ formation scenario, which can account only for ∼ 1/4 of the excess (Eckner et al 2018), being the mass in GCs of the order of the mass of the nuclear star cluster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…D09 find that stripping is only effective in reducing the brightness of giants in the RGB phase (and has little effect on AGB and horizontal branch stars). Furthermore, only close pericenters (rp 15R for a solar type giant) will remove enough material to significantly alter the evolution of the giant (see also Leigh et al 2016). They conclude that 2×10 4 BHs inside of 0.1 pc are required to explain the observed dearth of intermediate luminosity giants.…”
Section: Red Giant Depletionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However these observations probe only low mass stars ( 2M ), and thus do not constrain the rate of NS/BH formation within the star-forming disks if the top-heavy disk IMF is truncated below a few solar masses. Other nearby galactic nuclei such as M31 possess disks of A stars, but no O and B stars (Leigh et al 2016); in these NSCs at least, the last major episode of star formation occurred 100 Myr ago.…”
Section: Stellar and Compact Object Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations