2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00334-013-0412-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the origins and spread of Olea europaea L. (olive) domestication: evidence for shape variation of olive stones at Ugarit, Late Bronze Age, Syria—a window on the Mediterranean Basin and on the westward diffusion of olive varieties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic and archaeobotanical studies support the hypothesis of a domestication in the Levant with subsequent dispersal and some introgression from wild populations in the western Mediterranean (Murphy 2014;Newton et al 2014;Diez et al 2015;Dighton et al 2017). Archaeobotanically olives show a gradual increase, starting in the fourth or even fifth millennium bc up to the Iron Age (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genetic and archaeobotanical studies support the hypothesis of a domestication in the Levant with subsequent dispersal and some introgression from wild populations in the western Mediterranean (Murphy 2014;Newton et al 2014;Diez et al 2015;Dighton et al 2017). Archaeobotanically olives show a gradual increase, starting in the fourth or even fifth millennium bc up to the Iron Age (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…All specimens in the UCL archaeobotanical reference collection; scale bars 1 cm that wild and domesticated populations fall towards different ends of a morphological spectrum seems clear. Indeed, studies employing geometric morphometrics (GMM) on grapes (Vitis vinifera) (Pagnoux et al 2015;Bacilieri et al 2017), as well as on other taxa such as olives (Olea europaea) (Terral et al 2004;Newton et al 2014), plums (Prunus domestica) (Ucchesu et al 2017) and dates (Phoenix dactylifera) (Rivera et al 2014;Gros-Balthazard et al 2016), which factor out size and focus instead on shape, demonstrate statistically shape differences between wild and cultivated forms of these fruits, as well as among different cultivar groups. Domesticated forms have higher L:W ratios and tend to have more pointed (acute to acuminate) ends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular, archaeobotanical, and paleoenvironmental data are acknowledged as essential for reconstructing the history of the domesticated olive tree (Zohary and Hopf, 2000;Newton et al, 2014). Together with the walnut and chestnut trees, the present geographical distribution of genetic diversity in Olea europaea L. was perhaps more influenced by human activities than by its natural migration and colonization (Bottema and Woldring, 1990;Baldoni et al, 2006), a view confirmed by the frequent recovery of this pollen in the deposits from archeological sites .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…olive tree [15] and grapevine [16]). It is therefore difficult to identify truly wild populations, as demonstrated in olive trees [17]. More strikingly, in date palms ( Phoenix dactylifera L., Arecaceae) no wild population has been characterized to date [18–20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the olive tree [17,35], grapevine [36] or caimito [37]) and detect or suspect feral individuals [17,38]. Focusing on seeds rather than other plant organs is interesting because seeds are easily sampled and stored, and keep well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%