2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the origin of W UMa type contact binaries – a new method for computation of initial masses

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
81
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
9
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary star lies in the mainsequence band, while the secondary (less massive) is oversized and oveluminous for its mass. Actually, the radius of the secondary is 1.08 ± 0.02  R , nearly twice that of a mainsequence star with M = 0.43 ± 0.02  M , and follows the general radius difference of other A-type W UMa binaries found by Yildiz & Doğan (2013). In combination with the temperature difference between the components, there has probably been a past epoch of mass transfer.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The primary star lies in the mainsequence band, while the secondary (less massive) is oversized and oveluminous for its mass. Actually, the radius of the secondary is 1.08 ± 0.02  R , nearly twice that of a mainsequence star with M = 0.43 ± 0.02  M , and follows the general radius difference of other A-type W UMa binaries found by Yildiz & Doğan (2013). In combination with the temperature difference between the components, there has probably been a past epoch of mass transfer.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…By applying their method to HI Dra, we found that the initial mass of the currently less massive component (0.43 ± 0.02  M ) would be 2.25 ± 0.07  M , that is, HI Dra should have evolved to an A subtype as predicted by our best model. With an initial mass of the HI Dra currently massive component calculated as 1.11 ± 0.03  M , the calculated initial total mass of the system (3.36  M ) is in good agreement with the mean total initial mass for a typical A subtype of 3  M (Yildiz & Doğan 2013). Moreover, following the procedure described by Yıldız (2014), we estimated the current age (the summation of the durations of three phases: detached, semidetached, and contact) of the HI Dra binary system to be approximately 2.4 Gyr.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is observed that A-subtype contact binaries are dominant for q < 0.25, while W-subtype contact binaries exist in the early stage of evolution with q > 0.4 and both the subtypes are equally common in the region 0.25 < q < 0.4 (Yildiz & Dogan, 2013). The energy transfer in the common convective envelope of the contact binaries may occur in the deeper layers for A-subtype but in the outermost layers for W-subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, when the more massive star obscures the less massive one at the primary eclipse, it is called W-subtype (Binnendijk 1970(Binnendijk , 1977. At present, there are two conflicting arguments that W-subtypes evolve into A-subtypes (Flannery 1976;Lucy 1976;Wilson 1978;Mochnacki 1981;Hilditch 1989;Awadalla & Hanna 2005;Eker et al 2006;Gazeas & Niarchos 2006) and that there is no evolutionary link between them (Maceroni & Van't Veer 1996;Yildiz & Doğan 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%