2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2005.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the origin of the unusual orbit of Comet 2P/Encke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
108
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Levison 1996). We use T J = 3.05 instead of T J = 3.00 because small drifts in T J beyond 3.0 are possible due to non-gravitational forces or terrestrial planet interactions (e.g., Levison et al 2006;Hsieh and Haghighipour 2016). Other authors (e.g., Jewitt et al 2015c) have used T J = 3.08 as the boundary for similar reasons; the resulting list of MBC candidates is the same.…”
Section: Definitions: Active Asteroids and Main Belt Cometsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levison 1996). We use T J = 3.05 instead of T J = 3.00 because small drifts in T J beyond 3.0 are possible due to non-gravitational forces or terrestrial planet interactions (e.g., Levison et al 2006;Hsieh and Haghighipour 2016). Other authors (e.g., Jewitt et al 2015c) have used T J = 3.08 as the boundary for similar reasons; the resulting list of MBC candidates is the same.…”
Section: Definitions: Active Asteroids and Main Belt Cometsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farther than 300 AU, the calculations are performed in the barycentric frame and we increased the time step to 50 yr. Comets were removed once they were farther than 1000 AU from the Sun, or if they collided with the Sun or a planet. The terrestrial planets were not included because they only have a minimal effect on the dynamics of the JFCs (Levison et al 2006a) and they would increase computation time by at least an order of magnitude.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation and Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levison et al (2006), following orbits from the Kuiper belt, deduced that at any one time there should be one to a dozen objects in Encke-like orbits, neglecting both physical decay and nongravitational effects. They found that the time taken for a JFC to attain an Encke-like orbit, dynamically uncoupled from Jupiter, is 0.1 Myr, two orders of magnitude longer than its physical lifetime, but proposed that 2P/Encke might have survived destruction through a period of dormancy.…”
Section: Encke-like Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%