2013
DOI: 10.1134/s003103011303012x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the origin of Cetartiodactyla: Comparison of data on evolutionary morphology and Molecular biology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bivariate relationships between the individual vertebrae and body size are, however, strongly impacted by these species with extreme neck loading regimes. Much of the variation in cervical spine length, as well as in the individual vertebral lengths and proportions, is found in cetartiodactyls, due to the high degree of differentiation of neck morphology and function found in this lineage (neck length, skull and appendages morphology, feeding and locomotor habits) (see Vislobokova 2013).…”
Section: Internal Organization Of the Cervical Spinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bivariate relationships between the individual vertebrae and body size are, however, strongly impacted by these species with extreme neck loading regimes. Much of the variation in cervical spine length, as well as in the individual vertebral lengths and proportions, is found in cetartiodactyls, due to the high degree of differentiation of neck morphology and function found in this lineage (neck length, skull and appendages morphology, feeding and locomotor habits) (see Vislobokova 2013).…”
Section: Internal Organization Of the Cervical Spinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, these uncertainties sustained a diversity of opinions on the affinities of Hippopotamidae within fossil cetartiodactyls (for example, refs [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Among these, some noncladistic approaches are still radically in disagreement with molecular data 7,8 , whereas combined data set analyses have essentially maintained an unclear emergence of Hippopotamidae from an Oligocene ghost lineage, for example refs 3,4,9. In fact, the integration of Miocene hippopotamid data into morphology-based cladistic analyses brought substantial support to a hippopotamid emergence among anthracotheres 10,11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, some noncladistic approaches are still radically in disagreement with molecular data 7,8 , whereas combined data set analyses have essentially maintained an unclear emergence of Hippopotamidae from an Oligocene ghost lineage, for example refs 3,4,9. In fact, the integration of Miocene hippopotamid data into morphology-based cladistic analyses brought substantial support to a hippopotamid emergence among anthracotheres 10,11 . However, this approach did not succeed in precisely identifying the stem group of Hippopotamidae among anthracotheres.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved understanding of the Paraguayan fauna is vital to understand the impacts of anthropogenic changes. Vislobokova (2013); for Cingulata, Gibb et al (2016); and for Primates, Rylands and Mittermeier (2009). Genera and species are arranged in alphabetical order within subfamilies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verification of literature records by actual examination of specimens (including photographs) is much needed but far beyond the scope of this report; it is our intent to provide a useful platform for such study. Nomenclature and taxonomic arrangement to subfamily level follows Wilson and Reeder (2005) with the following exceptions: for Cetartiodactyla we follow Agnarsson and May-Collado (2008) and Vislobokova (2013); for Cingulata, Gibb et al (2016); and for Primates, Rylands and Mittermeier (2009). Genera and species are arranged in alphabetical order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%