2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2003.09.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the orbital evolution of explosion fragments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fields for fragment search were chosen at the points where the apparent density of catalogued GEO objects in the right ascension -declination space is maximum, or where fragments of presumably exploded objects cross the GEO ring and their parent objects' orbits (Sochilina et al, 2004). In a 2-year period, 150 unknown objects of magnitudes 15-20.5 were detected and about 25,000 measurements in 1400 series were obtained.…”
Section: Observations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fields for fragment search were chosen at the points where the apparent density of catalogued GEO objects in the right ascension -declination space is maximum, or where fragments of presumably exploded objects cross the GEO ring and their parent objects' orbits (Sochilina et al, 2004). In a 2-year period, 150 unknown objects of magnitudes 15-20.5 were detected and about 25,000 measurements in 1400 series were obtained.…”
Section: Observations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we generate fragments from a breakup event in the geostationary region, cited in literatures (e.g. [6][7][8][9]), using the NASA standard breakup model 2001 revision (see [10]). Then, we propagate their orbit till planned observation date to predict population of the generated fragments.…”
Section: Strategy Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%