2006
DOI: 10.1142/s0218216506004701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Orbit Decomposition of Finite Quandles

Abstract: We study the structure of finite quandles in terms of subquandles. Every finite quandle Q decomposes in a natural way as a union of disjoint Q-complemented subquandles; this decomposition coincides with the usual orbit decomposition of Q. Conversely, the structure of a finite quandle with a given orbit decomposition is determined by its structure maps. We describe a procedure for finding all non-connected quandle structures on a disjoint union of subquandles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a Shortly after the conclusion of the KSU REU, Nelson and Wong[6] announced the independent discovery of a decomposition theorem equivalent to this theorem and the preceding, when viewed as a decomposition theorem, rather than a construction. In their result, the extra structure is expressed in terms of compatible rack actions, rather than compatible group homomorphisms from universal augmentation groups to automorphism groups.J.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a Shortly after the conclusion of the KSU REU, Nelson and Wong[6] announced the independent discovery of a decomposition theorem equivalent to this theorem and the preceding, when viewed as a decomposition theorem, rather than a construction. In their result, the extra structure is expressed in terms of compatible rack actions, rather than compatible group homomorphisms from universal augmentation groups to automorphism groups.J.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The qp polynomial distinguishes between some quandles which have the same orbit decomposition but different structure maps (see [11]).…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quandle Q is decomposable if we may write Q = Q 1 ∪ Q 2 where Q 1 ∩ Q 2 = ∅ and Q 1 , Q 2 are both subquandles of Q. Note that even if a quandle is not decomposable in this sense, we may still be able to write Q = n i=1 Q i for Q i disjoint subquandles; see [1] and [8]. A quandle is connected if there is an element a ∈ Q such that every element of Q is equivalent to a word of the form…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%