On the optimization of bone SPECT/CT in terms of image quality and radiation dose

Abstract

Introduction The purpose of this study was to present the optimization process of CT parameters to reduce patient exposure during bone SPECT/CT without affecting the quality of SPECT images with attenuation correction (AC). Material and methods A fillable phantom reflecting realistic bone scintigraphy conditions was developed and acquired on an AnyScan SC. SPECT/CT scans were carried out with different x‐ray tube current values (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 90, 110, 130, 150, and 200 mA) at three different high‐voltage values (80, 100, and 120 kV). The contrast (C) and coefficients of variation (CV) in the SPECT images as well as the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and noise (SDCT) in the CT images with CTDIvol were measured. An optimal acquisition protocol that obtained SPECT/CT images with no artifacts on both CT and SPECT images, acceptable C, SNR, CV, and SDCT values, and the largest reduction in patient exposure compared to the reference acquisition procedure was sought. Results The optimal set of parameters for bone SPECT/CT was determined based on a phantom study. It has been implemented in clinical practice. Two groups of patients were examined according to the baseline and optimized protocols, respectively. The new SPECT/CT protocol substantially reduced patients’ radiation exposure compared to the old protocol while maintaining the required diagnostic quality of SPECT and CT images. Conclusions In the study, we present a methodology that finds a compromise between diagnostic information and patient exposure during bone SPECT/CT procedures.

Enhancing Nuclear Medicine Practice in Saudi Arabia: Advocating for Comprehensive Guidelines and Local Diagnostic Reference Levels

“…Eighty-six percent of the bone scans in the current study were performed on patients with breast and prostate cancers, utilizing the whole body SPECT examination protocol (1110 MBq) to evaluate remote skeletal or extra-axial lesions that might be overlooked in local or targeted SPECT/CT [32][33][34]. This variation in the bone scan protocol may explain the higher median value in the current study compared to local Saudi and Gulf region data.…”

Incidence of exclusive extrapelvic skeletal metastasis in prostate carcinoma on bone scintigraphy

“…It adds approximately 0.5 to 2.6 mSv of radiation dose to the patient and approximately ≥ 12 mins to the acquisition time, depending on the area imaged. Thus, employing the need for caution while performing SPECT/CT[ 21 - 23 ]. Further, it is not always available in all Nuclear Medicine departments.…”

Experimental evaluation of absolute quantification in 99mTc‐TRODAT‐1 SPECT/CT brain dopamine transporter (DAT) studies

“…The greater the CoV value, the greater the noise in the SPECT images. 17,30 According to the Taguchi method, iteration number is the most important parameter for qualitative evaluation, whereas Poisson resampling is the most important factor for quantitative evaluation. Two separate techniques (qualitative and quantitative) can be focused on as per the findings of the Taguchi study.…”

“…Furthermore, the use of POP increases the noise level in the striatum and background regions when compared with not using POP. The greater the CoV value, the greater the noise in the SPECT images 17,30 …”