2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the optimal numerical time integration for Lagrangian DEM within implicit flow solvers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another simplifying assumption is made regarding the Young modulus of the moving particles, whereas the Young modulus is reduced one order of magnitude from the original value. Conducting a sensitivity analysis confirmed the findings of several other studies (Kawaguchi et al, 1997;Ketterhagen et al, 2007;Ketterhagen et al, 2005;Tuley et al, 2010;Hogue and Newland, 1994;Pérez, 2008;Silbert et al, 2001;Kruggel-Emden et al, 2007) that lowering the stiffness within a certain range does not affect the results of the DEM simulation. This is due to the fact that although changing the stiffness constant does affect the duration of a single collision, the velocity and trajectory of the particle after the collision is only dependent on the coefficient of restitution and the coefficients of friction.…”
Section: Dem Studysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Another simplifying assumption is made regarding the Young modulus of the moving particles, whereas the Young modulus is reduced one order of magnitude from the original value. Conducting a sensitivity analysis confirmed the findings of several other studies (Kawaguchi et al, 1997;Ketterhagen et al, 2007;Ketterhagen et al, 2005;Tuley et al, 2010;Hogue and Newland, 1994;Pérez, 2008;Silbert et al, 2001;Kruggel-Emden et al, 2007) that lowering the stiffness within a certain range does not affect the results of the DEM simulation. This is due to the fact that although changing the stiffness constant does affect the duration of a single collision, the velocity and trajectory of the particle after the collision is only dependent on the coefficient of restitution and the coefficients of friction.…”
Section: Dem Studysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The damping coefficients are η n,ij = 2| ln e| k n m eff /(π 2 + ln 2 e) and η t,ij = ( 2 7 )η n,ij , where m eff = m i m j /(m i + m j ) is the effective mass of the two contacting particles or a particle contacting an infinite mass wall, and e = 0.9 is the restitution coefficient [61,62]. The symplectic Euler integration algorithm [63][64][65] is used to update particle positions and velocities. The simulation time step is chosen to be it is smaller than the critical time step, which is one-tenth of the minimal natural oscillation period of the spring-mass system [41,[66][67][68].…”
Section: Appendix a Discrete Element Methods Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…one of the most commonly-used collisional force model is the nonlinear viscoelastic model, consisting of two components, i.e. elastic and viscous forces (Brilliantov et al, 1996;Haff and Anderson, 1993;Silbert et al, 2001;Tuley et al, 2010).…”
Section: Particle-particle Midair Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle motion and wind flow equations are integrated by predictor-corrector method AB3AM4; that is, 3-order Adamas-Bashforth method to perform prediction and 4-order Adams-Moulton method to perform correction. One of the main advantages of using such multi-step integration method is that the accuracy of results is not sensitive to the detection of exact moments of collision (Tuley et al, 2010). The charge transfer between the colliding pairs are caused by their asymmetric contact and can be determined by Eqs.…”
Section: Model Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%