1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00934745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the optimal mapping of distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
143
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
143
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, (X n,n , X n )). A similar bound is obtained for the second term in (9). We deduce by Gronwall's lemma that We recall a result proved in Rachev and Rüschendorf [14] giving L 2 -rates of convergence of empirical measures in the Wasserstein metric.…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 43supporting
confidence: 78%
“…, (X n,n , X n )). A similar bound is obtained for the second term in (9). We deduce by Gronwall's lemma that We recall a result proved in Rachev and Rüschendorf [14] giving L 2 -rates of convergence of empirical measures in the Wasserstein metric.…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 43supporting
confidence: 78%
“…If c satisfies a twist condition, meaning x ∈ X −→ c(x, y 1 ) − c(x, y 2 ) has no critical points for y 1 = y 2 ∈ Y , then we shall see that not only is the minimizing γ unique, but its mass concentrates entirely on the graph of a single map f 1 : X −→ Y (a numbered limb system with one limb), thus solving a form of the transportation problem posed earlier by Monge [61,81]. This was proved in comparable generality by Gangbo [52] and Levin [66] (see also Ma, Trudinger and Wang [72]), building on the more specific examples of strictly convex cost functions c(x, y) = h(x − y) in X = Y = R n analyzed by Caffarelli [19], Gangbo and McCann [53,54], Rüschendorf [89,90] and in case h(x) = |x| 2 by Abdellaoui and Heinich [1], Brenier [17,18], Cuesta-Albertos, Matrán, and Tuero-Díaz [31,32], Cullen and Purser [34,35,87], Knott and Smith [64,93], and Rüschendorf and Rachev [91]. Adding further restrictions beyond this twist hypothesis allowed Ma, Trudinger, Wang [72,100], and later Loeper [68], to develop a regularity theory for the map f 1 : X −→ Y , embracing Delanoë [36], Caffarelli [20,21] and Urbas' [102] results for the quadratic cost, Gangbo and McCann's for its restriction to convex surfaces [55], and Wang's for reflector antenna design [106], which involves the restriction of c(x, y) = − log |x − y| to the sphere [57,107].…”
Section: Uniqueness Of Optimal Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can show that in this case one gets a unique minimizer given by the gradient of a convex function; see [3], [11], [20], and the references therein. Note that the Kantorovich-Wasserstein metric defines the distance between two mass densities, by seeking the "cheapest" way to transport the mass from one domain to another with respect to the metric (3).…”
Section: Monge-kantorovich Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the updating equation is given by (18) If SSD is used as the comparison term, has the form of (19) and if MI is used as the comparison term, is given by (20) where stands for 2-D convolution, and is the derivative of with respect to its first variable. Once the algorithm converges, we have the final warping function .…”
Section: Inimizermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation