Shock Waves 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85181-3_107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the ongoing quest to pinpoint the location of RR-MR transition in blast wave reflections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical simulations indicate that in its early stages the Mach stem may only be a few micrometers long [6], which is undetectable with typical optical visualisation systems, even if high-resolution recording material is used. Higher image magnification improves the spatial resolution and allows one to resolve smaller features, but while this approach reduces the aforementioned discrepancy between predicted transition point and first detection of a Mach stem, imaging limitations do not allow one to eliminate it [9]. Currently, neither single image nor time-resolved visualizations are capable to detect minuscule flow features with a characteristic length below ∼ 0.05 mm, such as, in this case, the Mach stem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Numerical simulations indicate that in its early stages the Mach stem may only be a few micrometers long [6], which is undetectable with typical optical visualisation systems, even if high-resolution recording material is used. Higher image magnification improves the spatial resolution and allows one to resolve smaller features, but while this approach reduces the aforementioned discrepancy between predicted transition point and first detection of a Mach stem, imaging limitations do not allow one to eliminate it [9]. Currently, neither single image nor time-resolved visualizations are capable to detect minuscule flow features with a characteristic length below ∼ 0.05 mm, such as, in this case, the Mach stem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%