49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2010.5718068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the observability of linear systems from random, compressive measurements

Abstract: Abstract-Recovering or estimating the initial state of a highdimensional system can require a potentially large number of measurements. In this paper, we explain how this burden can be significantly reduced for certain linear systems when randomized measurement operators are employed. Our work builds upon recent results from the field of Compressive Sensing (CS), in which a high-dimensional signal containing few nonzero entries can be efficiently recovered from a small number of random measurements. In particu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) RIP for Observability Matrices: As evidence of one other potential application, a recent paper in the control systems literature [36] reveals that our results for DBD and RBD matrices also have immediate extensions to the observability matrices that arise in the analysis of linear dynamical systems. Suppose that x j denotes the state of a system at time j, a matrix A describes the evolution of the system such that x j = Ax j−1 , and a matrix C describes the observation of the system such that y j = Cx j .…”
Section: ) Rip For Toeplitz Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) RIP for Observability Matrices: As evidence of one other potential application, a recent paper in the control systems literature [36] reveals that our results for DBD and RBD matrices also have immediate extensions to the observability matrices that arise in the analysis of linear dynamical systems. Suppose that x j denotes the state of a system at time j, a matrix A describes the evolution of the system such that x j = Ax j−1 , and a matrix C describes the observation of the system such that y j = Cx j .…”
Section: ) Rip For Toeplitz Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent paper [36], however, details how O in fact has a straightforward relationship to a block diagonal matrix; how in certain settings (such as when A is unitary and C is random) O can satisfy the RIP; and how this can enable the recovery of sparse initial states x 1 from far fewer measurements than conventional rank-based observability theory suggests.…”
Section: ) Rip For Toeplitz Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of a difference equation, for example, a sparse system may be a high-dimensional system with only a few non-zero coefficients or it may be a system with an impulse response that is long but contains only a few non-zero terms. Multipath propagation [1]- [3], sparse channel estimation [4]- [6], largescale interconnected systems with sparse graph flow [7]- [10], time varying systems with few piecewise-constant parameter changes [11], [12], and sparse initial state estimation [13], [14] are examples involving dynamical systems that are highdimensional in terms of their ambient dimension but have a sparse (low-order) representation.…”
Section: A High-dimensional But Sparse Dynamical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observability matrix was analyzed in the framework of compressive sensing and the observability and identification of linear system were discussed in [12] and [13]. With a different motivation, the compressive sensing was used to sparsify the system states, and then the recovered states were used for feedback [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%