1933
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1933-1501672-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the numerators of the convergents of the Stieltjes continued fractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
1

Year Published

1962
1962
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(3 reference statements)
3
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and the above results also follow from the classical theory of continued fractions (for example, see [10] and the remarks in [5]). In view of this, it seems natural to attempt a study of the properties of the polynomials, Pn(x), as determined by the coefficients, cn and Xn.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and the above results also follow from the classical theory of continued fractions (for example, see [10] and the remarks in [5]). In view of this, it seems natural to attempt a study of the properties of the polynomials, Pn(x), as determined by the coefficients, cn and Xn.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…(Thus the P*'(x) are the "numerator polynomials" [5] of the P[*-1)(x).) (a(*)| ¿,(fc)) denotes the true interval of orthogonality of {P£>(x)} ; (a(0), ö(0)) = (a,b).…”
Section: ^And0<1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that Theorem 2.1 gives a new characterization of the measure of orthogonality corresponding to the first associated orthogonal polynomials, which is different from the representations commonly used in the literature (see e.g. Sherman [15] or Grosjean [9]). For example, it is shown in Van Assche [19] that the Stieltjes transform of the orthogonality measure corresponding to the first associated orthogonal polynomials is given by the equation (2.6) and ψ (1) could be determined from ψ by the Stieltjes inversion formula.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…and conclude that the corresponding Hamburger moment problem is indeterminate. But Sherman [13] has noted that if the Hamburger moment problem for (1.1) is determined, so is the moment problem for the corresponding numerator polynomials (of (2.15)); hence by induction, the moment problem for the numerator polynomials of order j is determined. It thus follows that the moment problem for (1.1) must be indeterminate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%