1997
DOI: 10.4064/aa-81-4-365-367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the number of sums and products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
153
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
153
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further improvements to this result were achieved by Nathanson [17], Ford [12], Elekes [8], and finally Solymosi [19] and [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Further improvements to this result were achieved by Nathanson [17], Ford [12], Elekes [8], and finally Solymosi [19] and [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The version over finite fields is harder, since there is no natural topology or fully natural ordering to work with. (Over R, there is a brief and very natural proof [Ele97] based on a result that is essentially topological [ST83]; the best-known bound for the sum-product theorem over R has a direct proof, also topological [Sol09]. )…”
Section: And Thus Of a Hence μ(Hg) K −O(1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The insight that this lemma has something to do with incidences and similar problems is due to Székely [Szé97]. Elekes [Ele97] used the crossing lemma to prove surprising lower bounds on sum and products problems.…”
Section: Bibliographical Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%