2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2020.107559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the number of simplices required to triangulate a Lie group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important family of examples whose covering type can be estimated with our methods are non-simply connected Lie groups. Our results extend the results of [8] where estimates of covering type of all simple simply-connected compact Lie groups were obtained based on rational cohomology rings and the methods of [14].…”
Section: Covering Type Of Spaces With Finite Cyclic Fundamental Groupsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An important family of examples whose covering type can be estimated with our methods are non-simply connected Lie groups. Our results extend the results of [8] where estimates of covering type of all simple simply-connected compact Lie groups were obtained based on rational cohomology rings and the methods of [14].…”
Section: Covering Type Of Spaces With Finite Cyclic Fundamental Groupsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Remark 4.15. While the specific numerical formulas may not be particularly nice or elucidating, we may still observe that triangulations of the quotient of the special unitary group by its centre require at least around 8 3 n 3 vertices. For comparison, a triangulation of SU (n) as estimated in [14, Corollary 3.7] requires at least around 2 3 n 3 vertices.…”
Section: Covering Type Of Spaces With Finite Cyclic Fundamental Groupmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The question of the number of simplices required to triangulate a given manifold is often attacked by sophisticated cohomological methods involving characteristic classes (such arguments also often yield estimates on the minimal embedding dimension for the manifold). Surprisingly, much of this work is very recent [6], [7]. A main result in [7] is the following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%