2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the null controllability of heat equation with memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, observe that hypothesis (H) implies that the kernel K has to vanish exponentially as t goes to 0 + and to T − . Nevertheless, following the classical approach of [5] (see also [17]), it is possible to remove the decay assumption at t = 0, but this at the price of losing any information on the controllability cost. In fact, in this case we shall argue by a fixed point procedure, implying that we do not have a constructive method to build the control.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, observe that hypothesis (H) implies that the kernel K has to vanish exponentially as t goes to 0 + and to T − . Nevertheless, following the classical approach of [5] (see also [17]), it is possible to remove the decay assumption at t = 0, but this at the price of losing any information on the controllability cost. In fact, in this case we shall argue by a fixed point procedure, implying that we do not have a constructive method to build the control.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It combines energy estimates and the fact that β ≤ α in Q (see, e.g., [5]). Furthermore, using (3.22) and the classical approach presented in several works ( [5,8,9,17]), it is possible to obtain the following result. Proposition 3.2.…”
Section: Removing the Assumption On The Decay Of The Kernel In T =mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Approximate controllability for a heat equation perturbed by a memory term t 0 H(t− s)u(s) ds when the relaxation kernel has compact support is proved via Carleman inequalities in [14]. A positive result on controllability to the target zero for this class of systems when H(t) has very special properties is proved in [22] via Carleman estimates. Controllability of systems with fractional derivatives (in time) have been advocated in particular by M. Yamamoto, and we cite the paper [5] where approximate controllability is proved for the system (1) with boundary controls, in the case that N (t) is the Dirac delta and K(t) = (1/Γ(1 − α))t −α (see also [12,24]).…”
Section: Comments On Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14]; for hyperbolic PDEs with memory controllability is achieved by perturbation of the elastic case. Parabolic problems appear to be more subtle, since the incorporation of memory effects into Carleman inequalities is a nontrivial problem; we refer to [8,24] for recent work showing both negative and positive results under certain situations. However, in a viscoelastic fluid the future evolution is not controlled to zero simply by controlling the velocity, and the focus of this paper is control of the full state of the system.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%