1969
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1969-0244196-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the norms of units in quadratic fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since q r = −1, by a result of Dirichlet (cf. [14]), we get that the fundamental unit of K 2 = Q( √ qr) has norm −1. Therefore, by Lemma 2, we have a 2 = 1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since q r = −1, by a result of Dirichlet (cf. [14]), we get that the fundamental unit of K 2 = Q( √ qr) has norm −1. Therefore, by Lemma 2, we have a 2 = 1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A result of Dirichlet (cf. [14]) implies that for two distinct prime numbers r and s, if the Legendre symbol r s = −1, then the fundamental unit of Q( √ rs) has norm −1. Thus the hypotheses of Theorem 1, Theorem 2 and Theorem 3 imply that the fundamental units of the subfields Q( √ qr) and Q( √ pq) of K ′ , F and K ′′ respectively, have norm −1.…”
Section: Statements Of Main Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, we will give lower bounds for The first result in this direction goes back to Redei [1936;1939]. 1989;Hurrelbrink 1990;Pumpliin 1968;Trotter 1969]. …”
Section: Proven Densities For the Negative Pell Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , P n ) to give a sufficient condition for N ( 0 ) = g. The proof is an analogue of the proof in [14] for quadratic number fields. Proof.…”
Section: Definition 22 (See Bae and Koomentioning
confidence: 83%