2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10712-021-09646-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Normal-Incidence Reflection Coefficient in Porous Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four boundary conditions need to be followed across the interface (Deresiewicz & Skalak, 1963), including (1) the solid displacements are continuous; (2) the relative fluid displacements are continuous; (3) the normal solid stresses are continuous and (4) the fluid pressures are continuous. Based on the previous boundary conditions, normal R/T coefficient matrix equation is given as follows (Carcione et al, 2021;Geertsma & Smit, 1961),…”
Section: Theory Biot's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Four boundary conditions need to be followed across the interface (Deresiewicz & Skalak, 1963), including (1) the solid displacements are continuous; (2) the relative fluid displacements are continuous; (3) the normal solid stresses are continuous and (4) the fluid pressures are continuous. Based on the previous boundary conditions, normal R/T coefficient matrix equation is given as follows (Carcione et al, 2021;Geertsma & Smit, 1961),…”
Section: Theory Biot's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four boundary conditions need to be followed across the interface (Deresiewicz & Skalak, 1963), including (1) the solid displacements are continuous; (2) the relative fluid displacements are continuous; (3) the normal solid stresses are continuous and (4) the fluid pressures are continuous. Based on the previous boundary conditions, normal R / T coefficient matrix equation is given as follows (Carcione et al., 2021; Geertsma & Smit, 1961), []1111m11m2()1m1()2m2()2B11B2()1badbreak−B12badbreak−B22C11C2()1badbreak−C12badbreak−C22[]RR2TT2badbreak=[]1m11B1()1C1()1,$$\begin{equation}\left[ { \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{@{}*{4}{c}@{}} 1 & \quad 1 & \quad 1 & \quad 1\\ {m_1^{\left( 1 \right)}} & \quad{m_2^{\left( 1 \right)}} & \quad{m_1^{\left( 2 \right)}} & \quad{m_2^{\left( 2 \right)}}\\ {B_1^{\left( 1 \right)}} & \quad{B_2^{\left( 1 \right)}} & \quad{ - B_1^{\left( 2 \right)}} & \quad{ - B_2^{\left( 2 \right)}}\\ {C_1^{\left( 1 \right)}} & \quad{C_2^{\left( 1 \right)}} & \quad{ - C_1^{\left( 2 \right)}} & \quad{ - C_2^{\left( 2 \right)}} \end{array} } \right]\left[ { \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{@{}*{1}{c}@{}} R\\ {{R}_2}\\ T\\ {{T}_2} \end{array} } \right] = \left[ { \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{@{}*{1}{c}@{}} 1\\ {m_1^{\left( 1 \right)}}\\ { - B_1^{\left( 1...…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations