Statistical models are known to be simple and effective tools for interseasonal predictions of ENSO dynamics (Barnston et al., 2012; Jan van Oldenborgh et al., 2005). The IRI/CPC ENSO Predictions Plume (Barnston et al., 2012)-an ensemble forecast of the Niño 3.4 index defined as the average sea surface temperatures (SST) in the region (5°N-5°S, 170°W-120°W)-demonstrates that both statistical and dynamical models yield close prediction skills at lead times up to 12 months. This similarity likely reflects the near-linearity of the seasonal tropical Indo-Pacific SST predictability studied by Newman and Sardeshmukh (2017). The main factor limiting statistical forecasts is the spring predictability barrier (SPB), also called the spring persistence barrier, that is, the empirically observed loss of autocorrelations in the tropical Pacific climate dynamics in May-June (Barnston et al., 2012; Torrence & Webster, 1998). Since many statistical models rely on SST anomalies (SSTAs) in the tropics, the SPB impacts statistical models more than dynamical models during forecasts beginning in spring (Barnston et al., 2012). Basically, the SPB phenomenon can be explained as a manifestation of ENSO seasonality related to the phase locking of ENSO dynamics with a seasonal cycle (Liu et al., 2018). In the tropical SSTA variability, there is a distinct one-year temporal pattern, hereinafter referred to as the ENSO cycle, that lasts from June to May of the following year, with persistent SST anomalies developing in the middle of the cycle (autumn-winter), whereas smaller and noisier anomalies appear at the beginning and end of the cycle (summer and spring, respectively). In particular, Tippett and L'Heureux (2020) recently showed that approximately 90% of the Niño 3.4 index variability can be explained by a one-dimensional deterministic signal defined on the June-May interval multiplied by different amplitudes in different years, with extrema in December and the lowest absolute values in May and June.