2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the (non-)universality of the mixing length parameter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. Results based on stellar modelling by Pinheiro & Fernandes (2013) show an opposite dependence to that of the numerical simulations, e.g. the mixing length parameter increases with the effective temperature, being thus consistent with the findings of Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6. Results based on stellar modelling by Pinheiro & Fernandes (2013) show an opposite dependence to that of the numerical simulations, e.g. the mixing length parameter increases with the effective temperature, being thus consistent with the findings of Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…6. Results based on stellar modelling by Pinheiro & Fernandes (2013) show an opposite dependence to that of the numerical simulations, e.g. the mixing length parameter increases with the effective temperature, being thus consistent with the findings of Houdek (1996) showed that the linewidth dip becomes more pronounced with decreasing surface density if the mixing-length parameter and anisotropy of the turbulent velocity field are kept constant in the model computations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We note that the interferometric radius measurements used in each run indirectly constrain the model mass. Moreover, α mlt is known to have a significant degree of correlation with the stellar mass and effective temperature (Pinheiro and Fernandes, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For convection zones the mixing length theory (MLT) by Böhm-Vitense (1958) is applied, where we adopted α ML = 1.0 unless stated otherwise. We note that the value of α ML is uncertain (Pinheiro & Fernandes 2013) and may differ for stars in different evolutionary stages and/or mass ranges. Nevertheless, a mixing length parameter of the order of unity is in agreement with observations (Ferraro et al 2006;Cox & Giuli 1968).…”
Section: Modelling Of Stellar Evolution and Mass Transfermentioning
confidence: 95%