2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2004.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Newton–Kantorovich hypothesis for solving equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
135
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…holds and K/K 1 can be arbitrarily large [2]- [8]. By comparing (1.10) and (1.13), we see that r ≤ r 1 .…”
Section: Local Casementioning
confidence: 92%
“…holds and K/K 1 can be arbitrarily large [2]- [8]. By comparing (1.10) and (1.13), we see that r ≤ r 1 .…”
Section: Local Casementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several special cases, and other applications can also be found in [18] (see also [1]- [17], [19], [20]). …”
Section: This Implies Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important extension of the Kantorovich theorem was obtained recently by Argyros [1], [2], who used a combination of Lipschitz and center-Lipschitz conditions in place of the Lipschitz conditions used by Kantorovich. In the present paper, we will formulate and prove an extension of the Kantorovich theorem for the generalized equation (1.3). The depth and scope of this theorem is such that when we specialize it to nonlinear operator equations we get results that are weaker than the Kantorovich theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, we use a similar one as that used by Argyros in [6] for the Lipschitz condition on the first derivative F , which consists of noticing that, as a consequence of the last condition being satisfied in Ω, we have, for the starting point x 0 , that:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%