1980
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90671-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the neuronal origin of the afferents to the ciliary ganglion in cat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Labeled cells were ipsilaterally distributed in the AM, the EW, the ventral CG and the dorsal part of VTA. These findings generally agreed with previous observations (Sugimoto et al 1977;Loewy et al 1978;Toyoshima et al 1980).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Labeled cells were ipsilaterally distributed in the AM, the EW, the ventral CG and the dorsal part of VTA. These findings generally agreed with previous observations (Sugimoto et al 1977;Loewy et al 1978;Toyoshima et al 1980).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…However, he described little of the synaptic organization. Furthermore, recent studies in cats using retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) have shown that OPNs are sparse within the EW, while most OPNs are located in the anteromedian nucleus (AM), the ventral central gray area (CG) and the dorsal part of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), which are in the vicinity of the EW (Sugimoto et al 1977;Loewy et al 1978;Toyoshima et al 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now clear that the term EW has been used to describe two distinct nuclei that differ dramatically in their patterns of connectivity and chemical signatures. This problem began to be evident when investigations of the location of preganglionic motoneurons in the cat showed that only a small portion of these cells was located within the cytoarchitecturally defined EW (Sugimoto et al, 1977;Toyoshima et al, 1980). This was quantified by Erichsen and May (2002), who showed that EW contains less than 5% of the preganglionic population.…”
Section: Developing a Rational Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 94%
“…104, 152, 195, 239). For example, in one of the clearest cases of this mismatch, cells in the classically-defined EW of cats project to the spinal cord and cerebellum (48, 217, 218, 314, 370), while the ciliary ganglion receives its central input from a collection of preganglionic cells along the midline of the rostral mesencephalon and in the ventral tegmental area (198, 371, 399). As discussed in a recent review (195), this has led to much confusion in the literature, and it is now generally accepted that the term EW must be supplemented with a terminology based on neuronal connectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%