2017
DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2017.1372371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the need to compensate the compensating variation in CGE modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third reason for preferring EV over CV is provided by Guerra and Sancho (2018), who show by means of a numerical example in the framework of the CD utility function that in case of a calibrated CGE model EV is not sensitive to the choice of the numeraire so that, contrarily to CV, it needs no correction. In SI-A5 and SI-B5 we prove mathematically that the EV of LES and IAS are independent of this choice.…”
Section: Equivalent Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third reason for preferring EV over CV is provided by Guerra and Sancho (2018), who show by means of a numerical example in the framework of the CD utility function that in case of a calibrated CGE model EV is not sensitive to the choice of the numeraire so that, contrarily to CV, it needs no correction. In SI-A5 and SI-B5 we prove mathematically that the EV of LES and IAS are independent of this choice.…”
Section: Equivalent Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%