On the nature of the verb in present day English (existential) there-constructions. Formal and communicative implications

Abstract

There is general agreement that be is the verb 'par excellence' in so-called English existential í/iere-constructions (existential TCs). In fact, on many occasions, a distinction is made between existential TCs -be TCs-and presentational TCs (non-be TCs). It is true, however, that other verbs may also occur in TCs. These are mainly intransitive verbs that express the ideas of permanence, being, existence, movement, position, entrance into the scene of discourse, arrival or continuation of an event (seem, come, remain, follow, develop, etc.).From a corpus-driven perspective, the proportion of non-be TCs in Present Day English (PDE) is analysed, granting special attention to their communicative valué. It is hypothesised that even though, strictly speaking, non-be TCs do not primarily express existence, they do share with be TCs their main pragmatic function -i.e. signal function-a traitgenuinely linked to the use of there. It is also examined whether any significant difference is observed between the use of non-be TCs in speech and writing, and what is the rationale for this difference (if any).

Türkçe'deki Varoluşsal Tümcelerin Metin Temelli İncelemesi

“…The structure of existentials has also been described and explored in various text types. For instance, Martinez Insua (2002) analyses English existential sentences in a subcorpus of British national corpus to reveal the verbs that are employed in these sentences. She concludes that in addition to the verb be existential constructions are also produced with other verbs such as seem, remain, follow which convey the meaning of being, existence and position.…”