1975
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(75)90132-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the nature of the iron sulfur cluster in a deuterated algal ferredoxin

Abstract: A protonated and a completely deuterated two-iron algal ferredoxin from Synechococcus lividus have been studied by optical, electron paramagnetic resonance, electron-nuclear double resonance, proton magnetic resonance and Mossbauer spectroscopies; temperature dependent magnetic susceptibility measurements are reported as well. These studies have confirmed the electron localized model of the active center in the two-iron ferredoxins, as previously deduced from studies of spinach ferredoxin, have yielded much mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this equation, assuming that the intrinsic hyperfine coupling constants for cysteine H and H R protons are 1.0 and 0.1 MHz, respectively; assuming that these nuclei are coupled only to the closer of the two Fe centers; and allowing the value of J eff to float, then one can obtain good agreement with the experimental hyperfine data on plant-type Fd's. However, the value of J eff obtained from this procedure is only about one-half the experimentally determined value of -100 cm -1 for plant-type Fd's 112,120,[134][135][136][137] Nonetheless, the conclusion from the application of this model for the hyperfine shifts of reduced plant-type Fd's is that this system is indeed valence-trapped, even at room temperature on the NMR time scale, and that the extra electron resides entirely on the Fe ligated to Cys 41 and 46 (M 1 ). 35,130 The same conclusion is reached for the vertebrate Fd's, namely, that the system is valence-trapped and that M 1 (ligated by Cys46 and 53) is the Fe(II) center.…”
Section: Implementation Of a Strategy For Paramagnetic Resonance Assimentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Given this equation, assuming that the intrinsic hyperfine coupling constants for cysteine H and H R protons are 1.0 and 0.1 MHz, respectively; assuming that these nuclei are coupled only to the closer of the two Fe centers; and allowing the value of J eff to float, then one can obtain good agreement with the experimental hyperfine data on plant-type Fd's. However, the value of J eff obtained from this procedure is only about one-half the experimentally determined value of -100 cm -1 for plant-type Fd's 112,120,[134][135][136][137] Nonetheless, the conclusion from the application of this model for the hyperfine shifts of reduced plant-type Fd's is that this system is indeed valence-trapped, even at room temperature on the NMR time scale, and that the extra electron resides entirely on the Fe ligated to Cys 41 and 46 (M 1 ). 35,130 The same conclusion is reached for the vertebrate Fd's, namely, that the system is valence-trapped and that M 1 (ligated by Cys46 and 53) is the Fe(II) center.…”
Section: Implementation Of a Strategy For Paramagnetic Resonance Assimentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The origin of the distribution is believed to be variations of the metal-ligand bond lengths due to random solvent interactions. We characterize the spread in the electronic spin energies with Gaussian distributions in the parameters g, D, and E=D, which is referred to as g- [51] and D-strain [46]. The metal-ligand variations will also cause a variation in the Mn-Mn distance in the molecules of a sample.…”
Section: Broadening Mechanisms Of the Epr Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include clusters with complete cysteine coordination as in ferredoxins, [7, 8, 20, 140143] or with some degree of noncysteine coordination. This section focuses on advanced EPR studies of the protein-derived, non-cysteinyl ligands of the FeS cluster.…”
Section: Cluster Ligationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spectroscopic techniques were invented roughly concurrently with the discovery of FeS proteins (i.e., late 1950’s – early 1960’s), [3–6] and ENDOR was applied to two-iron ferredoxins (2Fe-Fds) not long thereafter. [7, 8]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%