2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/wcncw.2014.6934900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Nash Equilibria of graphical games for channel access in multihop wireless networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A maximal scheduling vector corresponds to a feasible schedule such that no more devices can be activated without violating the interference constraints. As we have shown in [2], a NE strategy vector in the setup that we study is a maximal scheduling vector but a maximal scheduling vector is not necessarily a NE strategy vector. A maximal scheduling vector that is not a NE will never be chosen by autonomous devices, since at least one of them will be able to improve its payoff by simply switching to another strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A maximal scheduling vector corresponds to a feasible schedule such that no more devices can be activated without violating the interference constraints. As we have shown in [2], a NE strategy vector in the setup that we study is a maximal scheduling vector but a maximal scheduling vector is not necessarily a NE strategy vector. A maximal scheduling vector that is not a NE will never be chosen by autonomous devices, since at least one of them will be able to improve its payoff by simply switching to another strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Following up on our previous work [2], we model this scenario as a non-cooperative game, focusing on the Nash Equilibrium (NE) concept, i.e., a state where no device has motivation to unilaterally change its strategy. The goal of this work is two-fold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations