2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-007-0186-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the multivariate total least-squares approach to empirical coordinate transformations. Three algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from the table that regular shape of the error measurement is within 2%. 3)Irregular area measurement by compass Conventional calculation of the irregular area is approximated by the regular area [114,15,16] ,and the area can be obtained from the regular's. The table 5 is a regular processing of irregular circle area, where the radian of circular evenly is divided, approximating for four, five, hexagon area error.…”
Section: ) Measurement Of Multilateral Area By Compassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from the table that regular shape of the error measurement is within 2%. 3)Irregular area measurement by compass Conventional calculation of the irregular area is approximated by the regular area [114,15,16] ,and the area can be obtained from the regular's. The table 5 is a regular processing of irregular circle area, where the radian of circular evenly is divided, approximating for four, five, hexagon area error.…”
Section: ) Measurement Of Multilateral Area By Compassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Felus and Schaffrin [11] developed a Structured Total Least Squares algorithm to solve a planar linear conformal transformation with a particularly structured coefficient matrix A. Moreover, they proposed [12] a method based on the non-linear Euler-Lagrange condition equations for estimating a planar affine transformation by a multivariate TLS problem. Results showed that the differences between the TLS and the classical LS estimated parameters are small [12]; nevertheless they could affect significantly the final accuracy of the transformed coordinates.…”
Section: Errors-in-variables Model and Total Leastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they proposed [12] a method based on the non-linear Euler-Lagrange condition equations for estimating a planar affine transformation by a multivariate TLS problem. Results showed that the differences between the TLS and the classical LS estimated parameters are small [12]; nevertheless they could affect significantly the final accuracy of the transformed coordinates. TLS solutions for the 3D datum and affine transformations are also derived in [13] and [14], respectively.…”
Section: Errors-in-variables Model and Total Leastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above approach in its multivariate generalization, where the vector y turns into a n × d matrix Y and the vector ξ into a m × d matrix Ξ with d as dimension, has been applied quite successfully to the affine transformation; see, e.g., Schaffrin and Felus (2008), and Schaffrin and Wieser (2009) This works so well since, in this case, the matrix A remains unstructured. For the similarity transformation, however, the structure of A must be imprinted on E A as well, a fact that had already been emphasized by Felus and Schaffrin (2005).…”
Section: A Brief Review Of the Tls Approach Within An Eiv-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%