2004
DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/17/6/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the multiplicity of hyperelliptic integrals

Abstract: Let I(t) = δ(t) ω be an Abelian integral, where H = y 2 − x n+1 + P (x) is a hyperelliptic polynomial of Morse type, δ(t) a horizontal family of cycles in the curves {H = t}, and ω a polynomial 1-form in the variables x and y. We provide an upper bound on the multiplicity of I(t), away from the critical values of H. Namely: ord I(t) ≤ n − 1 + n(n−1) 2 if deg ω < deg H = n + 1. The reasoning goes as follows: we consider the analytic curve parameterized by the integrals along δ(t) of the n "Petrov" forms of H (p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, when studying the multiplicity of Abelian integrals associated to a hyperelliptic fibration in [8], we observe that odd degree Hamiltonians give rise to a Picard-Fuchs system with reducible monodromy, which is revealed by the presence of a vanishing cycle at infinity in the level curves of the polynomial. We build explicitly, by transformations on the Petrov frame, a quotient system and its corresponding minor determinant .…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also, when studying the multiplicity of Abelian integrals associated to a hyperelliptic fibration in [8], we observe that odd degree Hamiltonians give rise to a Picard-Fuchs system with reducible monodromy, which is revealed by the presence of a vanishing cycle at infinity in the level curves of the polynomial. We build explicitly, by transformations on the Petrov frame, a quotient system and its corresponding minor determinant .…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In particular, the works [3,17] have obtained the same upper bound for a linear system of differential equations using quite different methods. In [16], the author approaches the problem in the case of hyperelliptic integrals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%