1964
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1964)003<0651:otmocs>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Movements of Convective Storms, with Emphasis on Size Discrimination in Relation to Water-Budget Requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The counteracting effects of upwind development and downwind advection constitute the discrete propagation of convective cells, similar to squall-line behavior studied by Newton and Fankhauser (1964). In the absence of outside influences, the result would be a principal rain-band that remains sustained and quasi-stationary relative to the storm center for extended periods of time, which is consistent with observations in previous studies.…”
Section: B Growth and Sustenance Of The Principal Rainbandsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The counteracting effects of upwind development and downwind advection constitute the discrete propagation of convective cells, similar to squall-line behavior studied by Newton and Fankhauser (1964). In the absence of outside influences, the result would be a principal rain-band that remains sustained and quasi-stationary relative to the storm center for extended periods of time, which is consistent with observations in previous studies.…”
Section: B Growth and Sustenance Of The Principal Rainbandsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Byers and Braham (1949) noted that most storm elements within squall lines have some component of motion to the left 2 of the system's line-normal motion. In turn, Newton and Fankhauser (1964) were perhaps the first to point out that this might entail a significant along-line transport of hydrometeors, with the consequent development of a stratified line-parallel anvil cloud mass in which new storms were unlikely to develop. They also noted that, with respect to storm motion, the line's right-hand side was the site of most rapid growth for new and young convective cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The windstorm extended more 45 than 1000 km (620 mi) from the Ohio River southward to the Gulf Coast and was responsible 46 for several deaths, at least 30 injuries, and millions of dollars in damage, mainly to trees and 47 power lines. In addition, although the line of storms produced straight-line wind damage that 75 1 Magnitude of the mean low to mid-tropospheric flow, VMean, was calculated in the following manner: , where V850, V700, V500, and V300 refer to the magnitude of representative, raob-observed 850, 700, 500, and 300 hPa wind speeds, respectively, following Newton and Fankhauser (1964) and Corfidi et al (1996). While substantial, this 73 speed was below that of the mean, low-to mid-tropospheric flow (about 21.6 m s -1 or 42 kts; 74 Figure 1) 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%