2010
DOI: 10.2168/lmcs-6(2:2)2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Monadic Second-Order Transduction Hierarchy

Abstract: Abstract. We compare classes of finite relational structures via monadic second-order transductions. More precisely, we study the preorder where we set C ⊑ K if, and only if, there exists a transduction τ such that C ⊆ τ (K). If we only consider classes of incidence structures we can completely describe the resulting hierarchy. It is linear of order type ω+3. Each level can be characterised in terms of a suitable variant of tree-width. Canonical representatives of the various levels are: the class of all trees… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A graph M is a minor of a graph G if there exists a minor map from M to G, which is a map µ defined on M where When G is a graph, we use minorspGq to denote the class of all minors of G, and we extend this notation to a class G setting minorspGq " Ť GPG minorspGq. The following theorem is known; the first two parts are due to Robertson and Seymour's graph minor series (see [6]) and the third is due to Blumensath and Courcelle [5]. PROPOSITION 2.2.…”
Section: Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A graph M is a minor of a graph G if there exists a minor map from M to G, which is a map µ defined on M where When G is a graph, we use minorspGq to denote the class of all minors of G, and we extend this notation to a class G setting minorspGq " Ť GPG minorspGq. The following theorem is known; the first two parts are due to Robertson and Seymour's graph minor series (see [6]) and the third is due to Blumensath and Courcelle [5]. PROPOSITION 2.2.…”
Section: Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we provide a brief definition based on [1], simplified to target only the FO graph case. A basic FO-transduction τ 0 is a triple (χ, ν, µ) of FO formulas with 0, 1 and 2 free variables, respectively, such that τ 0 maps a graph G into a graph on the vertex set {v | G |= ν(v)} and the edge set {{u, v} | G |= µ(u, v)} (an induced subgraph of I µ (G)), or τ 0 (G) is undefined if G |= χ.…”
Section: Fo Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the model checking problem for first-order logic -given a graph G and an FO formula φ we want to decide whether G satisfies φ (written as G |= φ) -is trivially solvable in time |V (G)| O(|φ|) . "Efficient solvability" hence in this context often means fixed-parameter tractability (FPT); that is, solvability in time f (|φ|) · |V (G)| O (1) for some computable function f .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a second example, consider the across-connect operation which takes two copies of a graph G and connects corresponding nodes across. To implement this operation, we first construct the 2-copy of G [9]. Specifically, we take isomorphic copies G 1 and G 2 of G, where the universe of G i is…”
Section: Closure Of L-ebsp(· ·) Under Operations Implemented Using Tmentioning
confidence: 99%