2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the modelling of crowd dynamics by generalized kinetic models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no psychological connection between the groups is modeled, affiliative theories are often referenced (e.g., Aveni, 1977 ) to justify the inclusion of a group which stays together in a crowd situation (e.g., Feinberg & Johnson, 1995 ). For example, Dogbe (2012) modeled group behavior using attraction and repulsion interactions, where social groups (assumed to be friends and family in this model) are attracted to move together throughout the simulation, but are repulsed by other neighboring groups. By implementing group behavior in this way, Dogbe is simulating a crowd where the groups are essentially small numbers of people clumped together within the crowd, with no meaningful interaction other than to change formation in order to stay together as they move throughout the crowd.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no psychological connection between the groups is modeled, affiliative theories are often referenced (e.g., Aveni, 1977 ) to justify the inclusion of a group which stays together in a crowd situation (e.g., Feinberg & Johnson, 1995 ). For example, Dogbe (2012) modeled group behavior using attraction and repulsion interactions, where social groups (assumed to be friends and family in this model) are attracted to move together throughout the simulation, but are repulsed by other neighboring groups. By implementing group behavior in this way, Dogbe is simulating a crowd where the groups are essentially small numbers of people clumped together within the crowd, with no meaningful interaction other than to change formation in order to stay together as they move throughout the crowd.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-Local Crowd Dynamics (NLCD) [26][27][28] with a discrete element method (DEM) is a variant of macroscopic models. In the NLCD, each individual moves toward a fixed target, deviating from the best path according to the crowd distribution to avoid entering regions with higher densities.…”
Section: Physics-mathematics Crowd Models (Pmcm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative size of people will be even smaller and the camera configuration means that often only the head/shoulders is consistently visable. Future plans are to apply this work to real data from project partners, to use research datasets such as CUHK occlusion 1 to improve the ability to track occluded persons and to examine applying fluid dynamics models (such as [8]) to recognise other crowd-based behaviour and events.…”
Section: Person Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%