2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11831-021-09601-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Modeling and Simulation of SLM and SLS for Metal and Polymer Powders: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Q G is the power distribution given by the moving Goldak's doubleellipsoid heat source model as shown in Fig. 5 [29], this heat source model from the welding process, however, it is also suitable for research on the SLM process [30].…”
Section: Calculation Of the Required Heat Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q G is the power distribution given by the moving Goldak's doubleellipsoid heat source model as shown in Fig. 5 [29], this heat source model from the welding process, however, it is also suitable for research on the SLM process [30].…”
Section: Calculation Of the Required Heat Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, λ PB (T ) are usually estimated with the scalar conductivity λ PB (T ) as isotropic and as a function of the porosity of the powder bed, taking into account that the powder consists of solid grains and a liquid material (gas). An overview of possible modeling approaches is given by Papazoglou et al [11]. In the context of this publication, due to the missing experimental investigations of the present process, the approach of Yin et al [12] is chosen for simplicity.…”
Section: Thermal Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides excellent mechanical properties and good precision [157]. The main difference between SLS and SLM is that SLS uses the laser to fuse small particles of raw material to build a 3D part, whereas SLM completely melts the powdered material with the laser, resulting in local melt pools, thus obtaining very dense parts (>99% density) [158]. The DMLS procedure is similar to the SLM working process.…”
Section: Powder Bed Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%