2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the mechanisms of cavitation erosion – Coupling high speed videos to damage patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under these circumstances, cavitation has been found to develop inside fuel injection nozzles at the early studies of Badock et al (1999), Bergwerk (1959), Chaves et al (1995) and Nurick (1976), followed by Arcoumanis et al (2000), Blessing et al (2003), Mitroglou et al (2014) and Roth et al (2002) in more realistic real-size nozzle geometries offering optical access; equally helpful studies performed in transparent enlarged nozzle replicas [selectively (Andriotis et al 2008;Arcoumanis et al 2000;Miranda et al 2003; Mitroglou and Gavaises 2013;Powell et al 2000)] also indicate that cavitation plays an increasingly significant role in the nozzle's internal flow structure and development. Cavitation inside an injection hole is believed to enhance spray atomisation, either directly through the implosion of cavitation bubbles or indirectly because it increases turbulence in the nozzle flow (Badock et al 1999;Walther 2002); unfortunately, under certain circumstances induces erosion (Dular and Petkovšek 2015;Koukouvinis et al 2016) that may lead to catastrophic failures. Moreover, cavitation inside the injection holes promotes shot-toshot spray instabilities (Mitroglou et al 2011(Mitroglou et al , 2012Suh and Lee 2008), which, in turn, are responsible for poor combustion efficiency and increased emissions (Hayashi et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these circumstances, cavitation has been found to develop inside fuel injection nozzles at the early studies of Badock et al (1999), Bergwerk (1959), Chaves et al (1995) and Nurick (1976), followed by Arcoumanis et al (2000), Blessing et al (2003), Mitroglou et al (2014) and Roth et al (2002) in more realistic real-size nozzle geometries offering optical access; equally helpful studies performed in transparent enlarged nozzle replicas [selectively (Andriotis et al 2008;Arcoumanis et al 2000;Miranda et al 2003; Mitroglou and Gavaises 2013;Powell et al 2000)] also indicate that cavitation plays an increasingly significant role in the nozzle's internal flow structure and development. Cavitation inside an injection hole is believed to enhance spray atomisation, either directly through the implosion of cavitation bubbles or indirectly because it increases turbulence in the nozzle flow (Badock et al 1999;Walther 2002); unfortunately, under certain circumstances induces erosion (Dular and Petkovšek 2015;Koukouvinis et al 2016) that may lead to catastrophic failures. Moreover, cavitation inside the injection holes promotes shot-toshot spray instabilities (Mitroglou et al 2011(Mitroglou et al , 2012Suh and Lee 2008), which, in turn, are responsible for poor combustion efficiency and increased emissions (Hayashi et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a coherent vapour structure can be clearly seen to have been detached from the main cloud cavity and being convected downstream by the main flow. Since the collapse of coherent cavitating vortices has been linked to increased erosion aggression [30,35], accurate identification of the exact locations of vortex-cavitation inception and collapse is of high value when referring to injector nozzle flows. In order to be able to clearly identify a vapour cloud separation in the examined geometrical layout, initially, the grayscale range of the high-speed images was inverted (complimentary image), i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the surface of the underwater component generates high‐speed water flow, the water flow generates a large amount of bubbles and microjets due to the uneven pressure. The surface of the material will be repeatedly impacted by air bubbles and microjets . Pitting and voids will be generated on the surface of the material, which lead to a sharp drop in material strength, thus affecting service life and seriously threatening the normal and safe operation of the components .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface of the material will be repeatedly impacted by air bubbles and microjets. 4,5 Pitting and voids will be generated on the surface of the material, which lead to a sharp drop in material strength, thus affecting service life and seriously threatening the normal and safe operation of the components. 6 Therefore, mitigating the cause of corrosion and ensuring the safe operation and servicing life of underwater overcurrent components have important and far-reaching significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%