2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the mechanism of polarized metre-wave stellar emission

Abstract: Two coherent radio emission mechanisms operate in stellar coronae: plasma emission and cyclotron emission. They directly probe the electron density and magnetic field strength respectively. Most stellar radio detections have been made at cm-wavelengths where it is often not possible to uniquely identify the emission mechanism, hindering the utility of radio observations in probing coronal conditions. In anticipation of stellar observations from a suite of sensitive low-frequency (ν ∼ 102 MHz) radio telescopes,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theory allows the brightness temperature of cyclotron maser emission to be many orders of magnitude higher than this value (Treumann 2006;Melrose & Dulk 1982), and hence, the observed value can be readily accommodated. Fundamental plasma emission on the other hand cannot attain brightness temperatures 10 12 K, especially at such low frequencies (Vedantham 2021). As shown in §3.1, the projected source radius for plasma emission is x ≈ 7.4, giving an observed brightness temperature of ∼ 10 11 K. Although we note there is no precedence for plasma emission to be simultaneously occurring at this brightness throughout the corona (at x = 7.4 in this case), such a brightness temperature can be reached by plasma emission based on canonical theory if the plasma is highly turbulent (see Appendix A.1).…”
Section: Brightness Temperaturementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theory allows the brightness temperature of cyclotron maser emission to be many orders of magnitude higher than this value (Treumann 2006;Melrose & Dulk 1982), and hence, the observed value can be readily accommodated. Fundamental plasma emission on the other hand cannot attain brightness temperatures 10 12 K, especially at such low frequencies (Vedantham 2021). As shown in §3.1, the projected source radius for plasma emission is x ≈ 7.4, giving an observed brightness temperature of ∼ 10 11 K. Although we note there is no precedence for plasma emission to be simultaneously occurring at this brightness throughout the corona (at x = 7.4 in this case), such a brightness temperature can be reached by plasma emission based on canonical theory if the plasma is highly turbulent (see Appendix A.1).…”
Section: Brightness Temperaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is therefore in the o-mode if it originates in the polar regions, where the field points away from us, and x mode if it originates in the equatorial regions, where the field points towards us. Fundamental plasma emission is polarised in the o-mode, whereas cyclotron maser emission can be polarised in the x-mode or o-mode depending on the ambient plasma density (Dulk 1985;Vedantham 2021). Because WX UMa has a mostly axisymmetric dipolar field (Morin et al 2010), we use cyclotron maser emission from Jupiter as a benchmark for our discussion for the possibility of cyclotron maser emission from WX UMa (Zarka 1998).…”
Section: Polarisation Paritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common way to generate plasma emission is via an impulsive injection of heated plasma into the corona (Dulk 1985;Stepanov et al 2001). Assuming a stable hydrostatic density of the corona (Vedantham 2020;Callingham et al 2021), and applying Equations 15 and 22 of Stepanov et al (2001), the brightness temperature reaches ≈0.4×10 12 K if the impulsive event injected into the corona is 20 times the coronal temperature. The assumptions required in such a calculation are accurate to an order of magnitude as, for example, the coronal plasma density is an upper-limit since CR Dra is not resolved in the X-ray observations (Boller et al 2016).…”
Section: Plasma Radio Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a coronal loop, it is possible to set up an unstable losscone distribution of electron energies to drive the ECMI emission (Dulk 1985;Morosan et al 2016;Vedantham 2020). Injection of heated plasma into the loop, combined with magnetic mirroring, sets up the loss-cone distribution.…”
Section: Ecmi Radio Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, incoherent gyrosynchrotron radiation can be confidently excluded 1 . More detailed information about the emission physics can be found in Vedantham 64 .…”
Section: Radio Emission Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%