2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-005-0054-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Measurement of the Tensile Strength of Soft Rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The tensile strength and tensile properties will vary with changes in the external conditions such as temperature, confining pressure, humidity, and structural plane (Cai & Kaiser, 2004;Coviello et al, 2005). The Brazilian split test is a conventional method for determining tensile strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensile strength and tensile properties will vary with changes in the external conditions such as temperature, confining pressure, humidity, and structural plane (Cai & Kaiser, 2004;Coviello et al, 2005). The Brazilian split test is a conventional method for determining tensile strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the conjectures from theˆrst set of simulations and the observations made above-speciˆcally observation (2) which can be attributed to the trend among the test data points that at higher P2S values, there is a wider divergence between the positive half cycle data points and negative half cycle data points, as shown in Fig. 36, the SS curves referred to as Model 3 were introduced 4,5,6 .…”
Section: Simulations Considering the P2s Effectmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The block samples were then packaged and shipped to the Geo- 1 The tensile strength was not measured. However, since the ratio between the tensile strength and compressive strength of soft rocks can be as high as 0.20 (Coviello et al, 2005), cyclic loading behaviour considering the tensile strength of soft rocks may have to be explored in future studies. 3 ; moisture content was around 31z; and the mean diameter D50 was from 0.20 mm to 0.25 mm (after thorough crushing).…”
Section: Triaxial Cyclic Loading Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the use of jaws with quite small contacts like those of the line loading condition are not suggested to prevent reaching excessive compressive stress concentrations that can make invalid failures. In the use of 15° jaw, compressive stresses were not found to be enough high for causing the invalid compressive failure as the ratio of the maximum compressive stress was 4 times of the maximum tensile stress [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%