2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00321-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the measurement of relative and absolute income-related health inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
120
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
120
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, there is still some controversy in the literature regarding which disparity indices meet the most ideal properties (Clarke et al 2002;Erreygers 2009a, b;Wagstaff 2009). Concern also emerged as to how changes in the prevalence of the health variable being measured may affect the disparity estimates (Scanlan 2006;Cheng et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, there is still some controversy in the literature regarding which disparity indices meet the most ideal properties (Clarke et al 2002;Erreygers 2009a, b;Wagstaff 2009). Concern also emerged as to how changes in the prevalence of the health variable being measured may affect the disparity estimates (Scanlan 2006;Cheng et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 However, as pointed out by Kjellsson and Gerdtham (2011), for bounded variables (e.g. mammography screening yes or no) (a) the maximum and minimum value of the CI depends on the average preventive care use in the country (Wagstaff, 2005), (b) the value of the CI depends on the scale of the preventive care variable (Erreygers, 2009a) and (c) the CI may rank countries by inequalities in doing a screening or not differently (Clarke et al, 2002). To account for these problems and to enable comparison of the results for different populations, Erreygers (2009a) and Wagstaff (2005) developed alternative corrections of the CI for bounded variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if we concentrate on distributions x 5 , x 6 and x 7 , we may conclude that x 5 exhibits the lowest headcount ratio, while x 6 and x 7 have the lowest values of inequality and intensity respectively. …”
Section: An Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…This difficulty arises not only in poverty measurement but also in different economic fields in which bounded variables are involved. Recent papers (among them Clarke et al [6], Erreygers [7] and Lambert and Zheng [18]) deal with this issue in health measurement. The results derived by Lambert and Zheng [18] may have a straightforward application to the measurement of the inequality among the poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%