2011
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/741/1/l8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Mass-Loss Rate of Massive Stars in the Low-Metallicity Galaxies Ic 1613, Wlm, and NGC 3109

Abstract: We present a spectroscopic analysis of Very Large Telescope/X-Shooter observations of six O-type stars in the lowmetallicity (Z ∼ 1/7 Z ) galaxies IC 1613, WLM, and NGC 3109. The stellar and wind parameters of these sources allow us, for the first time, to probe the mass loss versus metallicity dependence of stellar winds at metallicities below that of the Small Magellanic Cloud (at Z ∼ 1/5 Z ) by means of a modified wind momentum versus luminosity diagram. The wind strengths that we obtain for the objects in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
113
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
12
113
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the MWM rate of this star was much higher than predicted by the Vink et al (2001) relationship for its luminosity and metallicity (note that if the star is contaminated by a companion, which is always a worry at far distances, the actual luminosity would be lower and thus the discrepancy with the theory larger). As indicated in the introduction, this result is similar to that found by Tramper et al (2011) for stars in IC 1613, WLM and NGC 3109, who also adopted β (with values from 0.80 to 0.95, depending on luminosity class). As surprising as the β value obtained in this work may look, it solves the problem of the high MWM of GHV-62024, because it reduces the mass-loss rate while keeping all other parameters (nearly) fixed.…”
Section: The Wind Momentum Of Ghv-62024supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, the MWM rate of this star was much higher than predicted by the Vink et al (2001) relationship for its luminosity and metallicity (note that if the star is contaminated by a companion, which is always a worry at far distances, the actual luminosity would be lower and thus the discrepancy with the theory larger). As indicated in the introduction, this result is similar to that found by Tramper et al (2011) for stars in IC 1613, WLM and NGC 3109, who also adopted β (with values from 0.80 to 0.95, depending on luminosity class). As surprising as the β value obtained in this work may look, it solves the problem of the high MWM of GHV-62024, because it reduces the mass-loss rate while keeping all other parameters (nearly) fixed.…”
Section: The Wind Momentum Of Ghv-62024supporting
confidence: 87%
“…A preliminary analysis of this star by Herrero et al (2011) resulted in a too high log D mom as expected from its metallicity and luminosity, which would challenge the theory of radiatively driven winds at low metallicities. An even more serious challenge is the very recent work by Tramper et al (2011). These authors analysed six O-stars in low-Z galaxies (four in IC 1613 and one in WLM and NGC 3109).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While both Mokiem et al (2005Mokiem et al ( , 2006Mokiem et al ( , 2007a and Tramper et al (2011Tramper et al ( , 2014 used the V-band magnitude as a photometric anchor, we choose to use the K-band magnitude (M K ) to minimise the impact of uncertainties on the individual reddening of the objects in our sample. We determined M K using the VISTA observed K-band magnitude (Rubele et al 2012), adopting a distance modulus to the Tarantula nebula of 18.5 mag (see Paper I) and an average K-band extinction (A K ) of 0.21 mag (Maíz-Apellániz et al, in prep.).…”
Section: Atmosphere Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solving the radiative transfer across the atmosphere of massive stars is a complex and demanding task, and adequate atmospheric codes became available only in the past decade. Complex radiative transfer models such as CMFGEN (Hillier & Miller 1998), PoWR (Hamann et al 2006), and FASTWIND (Puls et al 2006), that take into account the necessary physics to study the radiation transport across the atmosphere and wind, have been separately employed to analyze observations of O stars (e.g., Hillier et al 2003;Martins et al 2005;Bouret et al 2003Bouret et al , 2005Puls et al 2006;Marcolino et al 2009;Najarro et al 2011;Repolust et al 2004;Mokiem et al 2005Mokiem et al , 2007Tramper et al 2011), LBVs (e.g., Hillier et al 2001;Groh et al 2006Groh et al , 2009Groh et al , 2011Groh et al , 2012Najarro et al 2009), and WRs (e.g., Hillier & Miller 1999;Dessart et al 2000;Gräfener & Hamann 2005;Sander et al 2012). From the stellar evolution perspective, the main advances have been to include the effects of rotation and magnetic fields, and improve opacities and mass-loss recipes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%