On the marginal social cost of cash‐cum‐in‐kind transfers

Duarte, Lucas Monteiro; Mattos, Enlinson; Serillo, Juliana Aranha

doi:10.1108/01443581111161832

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

(58 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At one time a very active research agenda related to whether it was a good idea to have the FSP as an in-kind transfer or simply a cash transfer called “cash-out” in the literature. The general consensus is that cash transfers are more efficient in the sense that they improve welfare for program participants at a lower cost to the tax payer as presented in Duarte et al (2011). More specifically, the arguments in favor of cash-out are that the in-kind transfer is costly to administer and distortionary in that recipients consume more food than they would under a cash transfer.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Have electronic benefits cards improved food access for food stamp recipients?

Lovett

Xue

2017

JES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate electronic benefits transfer (EBT) card reforms in California’s Food Stamp Program, and its impact on food insecurity. Design/methodology/approach The authors test the hypothesis that EBT cards reduce food insecurity by reducing the food costs associated with loss and theft of benefits, as well as by decreasing fraudulent sales of benefits. The authors use a natural experiment in the form of the time-varying roll-out of EBT card reforms across California counties in conjunction with the California Health Interview Survey, to conduct an event study. Findings The findings suggest no evidence for a decrease in food insecurity. The authors do, however, find evidence of a transitory increase in food insecurity immediately following implementation of EBT reforms. Reforms increase the likelihood of food insecurity by about 3 percent for up to two months. The result is distinguishable from zero, and robust to changes in specification, inclusion of controls, and measurement choices. The authors posit the increase was due to frictions in the transition to EBT card systems. Originality/value Although a considerable literature with regard to the FSP exists, very little has been written investigating a specific linkage between EBT cards and food security. The findings are not supportive of policy makers’ hypothesis that a positive externality of EBT benefits delivery is a lasting reduction in food insecurity.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%