1894
DOI: 10.2475/ajs.s3-48.285.230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the magnitude of the solar system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, William Harkness proceeded to publish a value of 8".842 ± 0.0118 based on US photof.,'Taphs obtained during the 1882 transit (Annual Report, ] 889: 424-425), and he and Newcomb were only able to improve on tlllS in the 1890s by re-analysing earlier data on the understanding that the solar parallax was intricately linked to such parameters as tlle lunar parallax, the constants of precession and nutation, the parallactic inequality of the Moon, the masses of Earth and Moon, and the velocity of light. Their values of 8".809 ± 0.0059 and 8">800 ± 0.0038 (Harkness, 1894;Newcomb, 1895) are remarkably close to the currentlyaccepted value of 8".794148 ± 0.000007, which was ratified by the lAU in 1976.…”
Section: Setting Up Thesupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Instead, William Harkness proceeded to publish a value of 8".842 ± 0.0118 based on US photof.,'Taphs obtained during the 1882 transit (Annual Report, ] 889: 424-425), and he and Newcomb were only able to improve on tlllS in the 1890s by re-analysing earlier data on the understanding that the solar parallax was intricately linked to such parameters as tlle lunar parallax, the constants of precession and nutation, the parallactic inequality of the Moon, the masses of Earth and Moon, and the velocity of light. Their values of 8".809 ± 0.0059 and 8">800 ± 0.0038 (Harkness, 1894;Newcomb, 1895) are remarkably close to the currentlyaccepted value of 8".794148 ± 0.000007, which was ratified by the lAU in 1976.…”
Section: Setting Up Thesupporting
confidence: 63%