1988
DOI: 10.1115/1.3187892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Machinability of Powder Metallurgy Austenitic Stainless Steels

Abstract: Powder Metallurgy (P/M) materials, especially those made of high strength steels, are often reported in the technical literature to have poor machinability when compared to their wrought or cast counterparts. In order to characterize the machinability of single phase P/M materials and to identify the influence of porosity on that behavior, the machinability of P/M 304L austenitic stainless steel was evaluated as a function of porosity, in the range of 64 to 90 percent of theoretical density. Machinability was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless a number of important investigations have been reported covering the effects of material density and 'free machining' additives as well as drill geometry and cutting conditions on the various technological machining performance measures (or machinability) of sintered materials [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. This is evident from the extremely low number of papers on machining presented at the many World Congresses on Power Metallurgy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless a number of important investigations have been reported covering the effects of material density and 'free machining' additives as well as drill geometry and cutting conditions on the various technological machining performance measures (or machinability) of sintered materials [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. This is evident from the extremely low number of papers on machining presented at the many World Congresses on Power Metallurgy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to define the shear level in the cutting zone. According [2] states, that the depth of the shear level follows the formula 0,05h ≤ h SP ≤ 0,1h, where h is the thickness of the cut section and h SP is the depth of the shear level. We observe elements from the cut layer in the shear layer that have been displayed (they melt the cutting edge).…”
Section: Experimental Procedures Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, other studies tend to postulate that the contact area between the tool and workpiece is always the same, regardless of the presence or absence of the voids in the structure of the material [27]. Regardless of the underlying mechanics, as Agapiou and DeVries [28] pointed out, the average pore is typically sized between 1 and 10 µm (however, can be up to about 100 µm) and therefore would always be considerably smaller than the cutting edge whose length is typically in the millimetre domain. As a result, it is practically impossible to have the cutting edge fully engaged with only one pore at a time and perhaps this is the reason why the experimental confirmation of this theory is still lacking in macroscale machining [29].…”
Section: Interrupted Cutting Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%