2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the low-cycle fatigue behavior of thermo-mechanically processed high-strength aluminum alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, small numbers of microcracks were initiated at the machining defects on the specimen surface. Upon microcrack initiation under cyclic loading (Figures 10a,c and 11a,c), the fatigue microcrack propagated along the perpendicular direction to the maximum stress axis and fanned out from the step of the fatigue microcrack initiate site before expanding forward until the occurrence of specimen fracture [35][36][37]. In high-magnification images, the fatigue microcracks were initiated on the secondary surface with coarse second phases since the second phase particles with insoluble Ce-rich rare earth compounds and iron-containing intermetallic compounds could cause stress concentration during the fatigue testing (Figures 10b,d and 11b,d), resulting in particles fragmentation, detachment, and initiation of microcracks [38][39][40].…”
Section: High Cycle Fatigue Performance Of 211zx Alloymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, small numbers of microcracks were initiated at the machining defects on the specimen surface. Upon microcrack initiation under cyclic loading (Figures 10a,c and 11a,c), the fatigue microcrack propagated along the perpendicular direction to the maximum stress axis and fanned out from the step of the fatigue microcrack initiate site before expanding forward until the occurrence of specimen fracture [35][36][37]. In high-magnification images, the fatigue microcracks were initiated on the secondary surface with coarse second phases since the second phase particles with insoluble Ce-rich rare earth compounds and iron-containing intermetallic compounds could cause stress concentration during the fatigue testing (Figures 10b,d and 11b,d), resulting in particles fragmentation, detachment, and initiation of microcracks [38][39][40].…”
Section: High Cycle Fatigue Performance Of 211zx Alloymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of fine and dispersed precipitates promotes low interparticle spacing. Low interparticle spacing is a key element in the strengthening of high‐strength aluminum alloys since dislocation motion can be considerably impeded due to the dislocation–precipitate interactions [45, 47]. However, coarse precipitates are formed in the vicinity of grain boundaries after the employment of low cooling rates as schematically shown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another detail present on the fracture surfaces of different specimens is the trace of the de-cohesion of coarse particles from the matrix. Weak precipitates/matrix interfaces provide suitable sites for crack initiation [45,46]. The size of these particles is larger for the specimens quenched in the air compared to other conditions.…”
Section: Fractographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of coarse precipitates leads to large interparticle spacing. [28,29] As a result of large interparticle spacing, dislocation motions can occur with less resistance during further deformation/loading of the material, eventually degrading the strength and hardness of components. Low strengths and hardness values obtained for all samples (even for the sample formed for 8 s on the cooled side of the tool following water cooling) already indicate that the interparticle spacing should be relatively large.…”
Section: Microstructure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%