2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97379-1_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Local Coefficients Matrix for Coverings of $$\mathrm{SL}_2$$SL2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. [GSS18] and Szpruch [Szp] have recently developed a reinterpretation of the coefficients of (1.77): the coefficients were presented as linear combinations of Tate γfactors, or "metaplectic" γ-factors (defined in [Szp11]), where the scalars were computed via harmonic analysis on F * r F * . The determinant of their local coefficients matrix was related to the Plancherel measure and may shed new light on the Plancherel formula for covering groups.…”
Section: The Casselman-shalika Formula For Glmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [GSS18] and Szpruch [Szp] have recently developed a reinterpretation of the coefficients of (1.77): the coefficients were presented as linear combinations of Tate γfactors, or "metaplectic" γ-factors (defined in [Szp11]), where the scalars were computed via harmonic analysis on F * r F * . The determinant of their local coefficients matrix was related to the Plancherel measure and may shed new light on the Plancherel formula for covering groups.…”
Section: The Casselman-shalika Formula For Glmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [GSS18,GSS] and Szpruch [Szp] replaced the local coefficient with a proportionality matrix, for generic representations. The determinant of this matrix becomes an invariant of the representation, and for unramified representations (and ramified principal series in low rank cases) they expressed this determinant in terms of Plancherel measures and Tate γ-factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%