2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the likelihood of non-terrestrial artifacts in the Solar System

Abstract: Extraterrestrial technology may exist in the Solar System without our knowledge. This is because the vastness of space, combined with our limited searches to date, implies that any remote unpiloted exploratory probes of extraterrestrial origin would likely remain unnoticed. Here we develop a probabilistic approach to quantify our certainty (or uncertainty) of the existence of such technology in the Solar System. We discuss some possible strategies for improving this uncertainty that include analysis of moon-an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of settlement success could come for many reasons ranging from failure of interstellar vessels capable of establishing persistent settlements to the inability to develop viable progeny civilizations on new worlds. Because Hart's conclusions stem from his assumption that we would have noticed if extraterrestrial technology had ever settled the Solar System, they are challenged by the work of Freitas (1985), Schmidt & Frank (2018), Davies (2012), andKopparapu (2012) who show that this is not necessarily the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of settlement success could come for many reasons ranging from failure of interstellar vessels capable of establishing persistent settlements to the inability to develop viable progeny civilizations on new worlds. Because Hart's conclusions stem from his assumption that we would have noticed if extraterrestrial technology had ever settled the Solar System, they are challenged by the work of Freitas (1985), Schmidt & Frank (2018), Davies (2012), andKopparapu (2012) who show that this is not necessarily the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we take indirect detection to mean the search for technosignatures (Tarter 2007) from distant sources outside the solar systems (e.g. Siemion et al 2013;Wright et al 2014) while direct detection means material evidence for an exo-civilization's visit to Earth or our solar system (Davies 2012;Haqq-Misra and Kopparapu 2012;Wright 2018) Such a distinction between direct and indirect detection is important. In Hart's formulation of the Fermi Paradox his "Fact A" was the lack of aliens on Earth now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we analogously relax Fact A and assert merely that there are no alien machines in the Solar System today, then its truth becomes quite uncertain because we have not done much searching for such machines (e.g. Haqq-Misra & Kopparapu 2012;Davies 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this would bring it into some conflict with the so-called Fermi's paradox, since we would have to explain why none of these probes (or their signals) have been detected thus far (Brin, 1983;Webb, 2015). Nevertheless, since we have not comprehensively surveyed the Solar neighbourhood, the presence of such probes cannot be ruled out definitively (Freitas, 1983;Loeb and Turner, 2012;Haqq-Misra and Kopparapu, 2012). 14 In the future, interstellar objects passing through the Solar system, like 'Oumuamua, can be searched for signs of electromagnetic signals (Enriquez et al, 2018;Tingay et al, 2018) or be subjected to detailed in situ exploration (Seligman and Laughlin, 2018).…”
Section: The Relative Likelihood and Its Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%