1980
DOI: 10.1017/s0021900200033738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the lengths of the pieces of a stick broken at random

Abstract: Consider the pieces of a randomly broken stick. How long is the j th longest piece? How many breaks are necessary for getting all pieces less than a given length? These and related questions are studied in particular when the number of pieces is large. Using simple properties of the exponential distribution new proofs are given of old results and new results are obtained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the spatial distribution of fiber breaks in a 2-D array of glass fibers is compared with break locations observed from SFFT specimens. In both cases, the break locations in each fiber were found to evolve to a uniform distribution, thereby confirming that the ordered fragment lengths from the repeated fracture process conforms for both SFFT and multi-fiber fragmentation test (MFFT) specimens to a cumulative distribution function (CDF) derived by Whitworth [2][3][4][5]. The array break density was also observed to be less than the break density in isolated fibers, and break locations across array fibers were observed to be highly coordinated and mostly aligned.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…In this paper, the spatial distribution of fiber breaks in a 2-D array of glass fibers is compared with break locations observed from SFFT specimens. In both cases, the break locations in each fiber were found to evolve to a uniform distribution, thereby confirming that the ordered fragment lengths from the repeated fracture process conforms for both SFFT and multi-fiber fragmentation test (MFFT) specimens to a cumulative distribution function (CDF) derived by Whitworth [2][3][4][5]. The array break density was also observed to be less than the break density in isolated fibers, and break locations across array fibers were observed to be highly coordinated and mostly aligned.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…For each fitness set we generated a random initial allele-frequency vector, ptrue˜=(p1,p2,,pn), using the broken stick method (Holst 1980). Since any n -allele polymorphism is also globally stable (Bürger 2000), the system will iterate to this equilibrium should it exist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the division of the known sales among the known stores could be represented as a stochastic sharing or breakage process, analogous to ecological models in which resources, niches, or John S. Pipkin / 183 space are split among species or individuals (Pielou 1969; Ord, Patil, and Taillie 1980). The broken stick model would be one straightforward way to represent the process (Holst 1980).…”
Section: / Geographic01mentioning
confidence: 99%