On the Large R-charge Expansion in N = 2 $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ Superconformal Field Theories

100

195

We initiate a systematic study of four dimensional N = 2 superconformal field theories (SCFTs) based on the analysis of their Coulomb branch geometries. Because these SCFTs are not uniquely characterized by their scale-invariant Coulomb branch geometries we also need information on their deformations. We construct all inequivalent such deformations preserving N = 2 supersymmetry and additional physical consistency conditions in the rank 1 case. These not only include all the ones previously predicted by S-duality, but also 16 additional deformations satisfying all the known N = 2 low energy consistency conditions. All but two of these additonal deformations have recently been identified with new rank 1 SCFTs; these identifications are briefly reviewed.Some novel ingredients which are important for this study include: a discussion of RG-flows in the presence of a moduli space of vacua; a classification of local N = 2 supersymmetry-preserving deformations of unitary N = 2 SCFTs; and an analysis of charge normalizations and the Dirac quantization condition on Coulomb branches. This paper is the first in a series of three. The second paper [1] gives the details of the explicit construction of the Coulomb branch geometries discussed here, while the third [2] discusses the computation of central charges of the associated SCFTs.

Section: Jhep02(2018)001mentioning

confidence: 59%

Section: Special Kähler Conditionsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Special Kähler Conditionsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Jhep02(2018)001mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Geometric constraints on the space of N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 2 SCFTs. Part I: physical constraints on relevant deformations

Argyres

Lotito

Lü

et al. 2018

100

195

“…It would be interesting to also clarify the connections of our program to the results coming from geometric engineering of N = 2 SCFTs, to 3d JHEP02(2018)003 N = 4 SCFTs via compactification, and to work on BPS quivers. Furthermore it worth pointing out the results in [59] which could shed light in how to directly connect the results obtained through our study of the CB geometry with those obtained studying the algebra of operators at the conformal vacuum.…”

Section: Jhep02(2018)003mentioning

confidence: 77%

Geometric constraints on the space of N=2 SCFTs. Part III: enhanced Coulomb branches and central charges

Argyres

Lotito

Lü

et al. 2018

117

254

This is the third in a series of three papers on the systematic analysis of rank 1 four dimensional N = 2 SCFTs. In the first two papers [1, 2] we developed and carried out a strategy for classifying and constructing physical planar rank-1 Coulomb branch geometries of N = 2 SCFTs. Here we describe general features of the Higgs and mixed branch geometries of the moduli space of these SCFTs, and use this, along with their Coulomb branch geometry, to compute their conformal and flavor central charges. We conclude with a summary of the state of the art for rank-1 N = 2 SCFTs.

Transition of large R-charge operators on a conformal manifold

Sharon

Watanabe

2021

We study the transition between phases at large R-charge on a conformal manifold. These phases are characterized by the behaviour of the lowest operator dimension ∆(QR) for fixed and large R-charge QR. We focus, as an example, on the D = 3, $$ \mathcal{N} $$ N = 2 Wess-Zumino model with cubic superpotential $$ W= XYZ+\frac{\tau }{6}\left({X}^3+{Y}^3+{Z}^3\right) $$ W = XYZ + τ 6 X 3 + Y 3 + Z 3 , and compute ∆(QR, τ) using the ϵ-expansion in three interesting limits. In two of these limits the (leading order) result turns out to be$$ \Delta \left({Q}_{R,\tau}\right)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}\left(\mathrm{BPS}\;\mathrm{bound}\right)\left[1+O\left(\epsilon {\left|\tau \right|}^2{Q}_R\right)\right],& {Q}_R\ll \left\{\frac{1}{\epsilon },\kern0.5em \frac{1}{\epsilon {\left|\tau \right|}^2}\right\}\\ {}\frac{9}{8}{\left(\frac{\epsilon {\left|\tau \right|}^2}{2+{\left|\tau \right|}^2}\right)}^{\frac{1}{D-1}}{Q}_R^{\frac{D}{D-1}}\left[1+O\left({\left(\epsilon {\left|\tau \right|}^2{Q}_R\right)}^{-\frac{2}{D-1}}\right)\right],& {Q}_R\gg \left\{\begin{array}{ll}\frac{1}{\epsilon },& \frac{1}{\epsilon {\left|\tau \right|}^2}\end{array}\right\}\end{array}\right. $$ Δ Q R , τ = BPS bound 1 + O ϵ τ 2 Q R , Q R ≪ 1 ϵ 1 ϵ τ 2 9 8 ϵ τ 2 2 + τ 2 1 D − 1 Q R D D − 1 1 + O ϵ τ 2 Q R − 2 D − 1 , Q R ≫ 1 ϵ , 1 ϵ τ 2 which leads us to the double-scaling parameter, ϵ|τ|2QR, which interpolates between the “near-BPS phase” (∆(Q) ∼ Q) and the “superfluid phase” (∆(Q) ∼ QD/(D−1)) at large R-charge. This smooth transition, happening near τ = 0, is a large-R-charge manifestation of the existence of a moduli space and an infinite chiral ring at τ = 0. We also argue that this behavior can be extended to three dimensions with minimal modifications, and so we conclude that ∆(QR, τ) experiences a smooth transition around QR ∼ 1/|τ|2. Additionally, we find a first-order phase transition for ∆(QR, τ) as a function of τ, as a consequence of the duality of the model. We also comment on the applicability of our result down to small R-charge.